Medium-term and peri-lockdown course of psychosocial burden during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal study on patients with pre-existing mental disorders

C. Bartels*, P. Hessmann, U. Schmidt, J. Vogelgsang, M. Ruhleder, A. Kratzenberg, M. Treptow, T. Reh-Bergen, M. Abdel-Hamid, L. Hess, M. Meiser, J. Signerski-Krieger, K. Radenbach, S. Trost, B.H. Schott, J. Wiltfang, C. Wolff-Menzler, M. Belz

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

While the COVID-19 pandemic continues, patients with pre-existing mental disorders are increasingly recognized as a risk group for adverse outcomes. However, data are conflicting and cover only short time spans so far. Here, we investigate the medium-term and peri-lockdown-related changes of mental health outcomes in such patients in a longitudinal study. A cohort of 159 patients comprising all major mental disorders (ICD-10 F0-F9) were interviewed twice with the Goettingen psychosocial Burden and Symptom Inventory (Goe-BSI) to evaluate psychosocial burden, psychiatric symptoms and resilience at the end of the first (April/May 2020) and the second lockdown in Germany (November/December 2020). For the primary outcome "psychosocial burden" ratings also comprised retrospective pre-pandemic (early 2020) and very early states during the pandemic (March 2020). For all diagnostic groups, psychosocial burden varied significantly over time (p < 0.001) with an increase from the pre-pandemic to the initial phase (p < 0.001), followed by a steady decrease across both lockdowns, normalizing in November/December 2020. Female gender, high adjustment disorder symptom load at baseline and psychiatric comorbidities were risk factors for higher levels and an unfavorable course of psychosocial burden. Most psychiatric symptoms changed minimally, while resilience decreased over time (p = 0.044 and p = 0.037). The longitudinal course of psychosocial burden indicates an initial stress response, followed by a return to pre-pandemic levels even under recurrent lockdown conditions, mimicking symptoms of an adjustment disorder. Strategies for proactive, specific and continuous treatment have to address resilience capacities before their depletion in the pandemic aftermath, especially for patients with additional risk factors.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)757-771
Number of pages15
JournalEuropean Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
Volume272
Issue number5
Early online date25 Nov 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2022

Keywords

  • Coronavirus
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • Mental health
  • Psychosocial stress
  • Adjustment disorder
  • ANXIETY
  • DEPRESSION
  • PEOPLE
  • IMPACT

Cite this