Measuring and theorizing regional governance

Kent Eaton, Jean-Paul Faguet, Imke Harbers, Arjan Schakel, L. Hooghe, G. Marks, S. Niedzwiecki, S. Chapman Osterkatz, S. Shair-Rosenfield

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This symposium Regional Authority and the Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance engages two recent books on regional governance. The first sets out a measure of regional authority for 81 countries in North America, Europe, Latin America, Asia and the Pacific between 1950 and 2010. The second theorizes how regional governance is shaped by functional and communal pressures. These pressures are detected in many historical episodes of jurisdictional reform. These books seek to pin them down empirically. Community and efficiency appear to have tangible and contrasting effects that explain how jurisdictions are designed, why regional governance has become differentiated and how multilevel governance has deepened over the past several decades. The symposium consists of contributions by Kent Eaton, Jean-Paul Faguet and Imke Harbers followed by a response from the authors: Liesbet Hooghe, Gary Marks, Arjan H. Schakel, Sara Niedzwiecki, Sandra Chapman Osterkatz and Sarah Shair-Rosenfield, Measuring Regional Authority: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance, Vol. I. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016; and Liesbet Hooghe and Gary Marks, with Arjan H. Schakel, Sara Niedzwiecki, Sandra Chapman Osterkatz and Sarah Shair-Rosenfield, Community, Scale, and Regional Governance: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance, Vol. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)265-283
Number of pages19
JournalTerritory, Politics, Governance
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Apr 2019

Keywords

  • DECENTRALIZATION
  • SUPPORT
  • community
  • decentralization
  • multilevel governance
  • regions
  • scale

Cite this

Eaton, K., Faguet, J-P., Harbers, I., Schakel, A., Hooghe, L., Marks, G., ... Shair-Rosenfield, S. (2019). Measuring and theorizing regional governance. Territory, Politics, Governance, 7(2), 265-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2018.1445021
Eaton, Kent ; Faguet, Jean-Paul ; Harbers, Imke ; Schakel, Arjan ; Hooghe, L. ; Marks, G. ; Niedzwiecki, S. ; Chapman Osterkatz, S. ; Shair-Rosenfield, S. / Measuring and theorizing regional governance. In: Territory, Politics, Governance. 2019 ; Vol. 7, No. 2. pp. 265-283.
@article{0db89b190c2546d99ce684a045204187,
title = "Measuring and theorizing regional governance",
abstract = "This symposium Regional Authority and the Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance engages two recent books on regional governance. The first sets out a measure of regional authority for 81 countries in North America, Europe, Latin America, Asia and the Pacific between 1950 and 2010. The second theorizes how regional governance is shaped by functional and communal pressures. These pressures are detected in many historical episodes of jurisdictional reform. These books seek to pin them down empirically. Community and efficiency appear to have tangible and contrasting effects that explain how jurisdictions are designed, why regional governance has become differentiated and how multilevel governance has deepened over the past several decades. The symposium consists of contributions by Kent Eaton, Jean-Paul Faguet and Imke Harbers followed by a response from the authors: Liesbet Hooghe, Gary Marks, Arjan H. Schakel, Sara Niedzwiecki, Sandra Chapman Osterkatz and Sarah Shair-Rosenfield, Measuring Regional Authority: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance, Vol. I. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016; and Liesbet Hooghe and Gary Marks, with Arjan H. Schakel, Sara Niedzwiecki, Sandra Chapman Osterkatz and Sarah Shair-Rosenfield, Community, Scale, and Regional Governance: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance, Vol. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.",
keywords = "DECENTRALIZATION, SUPPORT, community, decentralization, multilevel governance, regions, scale",
author = "Kent Eaton and Jean-Paul Faguet and Imke Harbers and Arjan Schakel and L. Hooghe and G. Marks and S. Niedzwiecki and {Chapman Osterkatz}, S. and S. Shair-Rosenfield",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/21622671.2018.1445021",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "265--283",
journal = "Territory, Politics, Governance",
issn = "2162-2671",
publisher = "Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "2",

}

Eaton, K, Faguet, J-P, Harbers, I, Schakel, A, Hooghe, L, Marks, G, Niedzwiecki, S, Chapman Osterkatz, S & Shair-Rosenfield, S 2019, 'Measuring and theorizing regional governance', Territory, Politics, Governance, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 265-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2018.1445021

Measuring and theorizing regional governance. / Eaton, Kent; Faguet, Jean-Paul; Harbers, Imke; Schakel, Arjan; Hooghe, L.; Marks, G.; Niedzwiecki, S.; Chapman Osterkatz, S.; Shair-Rosenfield, S.

In: Territory, Politics, Governance, Vol. 7, No. 2, 03.04.2019, p. 265-283.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring and theorizing regional governance

AU - Eaton, Kent

AU - Faguet, Jean-Paul

AU - Harbers, Imke

AU - Schakel, Arjan

AU - Hooghe, L.

AU - Marks, G.

AU - Niedzwiecki, S.

AU - Chapman Osterkatz, S.

AU - Shair-Rosenfield, S.

PY - 2019/4/3

Y1 - 2019/4/3

N2 - This symposium Regional Authority and the Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance engages two recent books on regional governance. The first sets out a measure of regional authority for 81 countries in North America, Europe, Latin America, Asia and the Pacific between 1950 and 2010. The second theorizes how regional governance is shaped by functional and communal pressures. These pressures are detected in many historical episodes of jurisdictional reform. These books seek to pin them down empirically. Community and efficiency appear to have tangible and contrasting effects that explain how jurisdictions are designed, why regional governance has become differentiated and how multilevel governance has deepened over the past several decades. The symposium consists of contributions by Kent Eaton, Jean-Paul Faguet and Imke Harbers followed by a response from the authors: Liesbet Hooghe, Gary Marks, Arjan H. Schakel, Sara Niedzwiecki, Sandra Chapman Osterkatz and Sarah Shair-Rosenfield, Measuring Regional Authority: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance, Vol. I. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016; and Liesbet Hooghe and Gary Marks, with Arjan H. Schakel, Sara Niedzwiecki, Sandra Chapman Osterkatz and Sarah Shair-Rosenfield, Community, Scale, and Regional Governance: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance, Vol. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.

AB - This symposium Regional Authority and the Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance engages two recent books on regional governance. The first sets out a measure of regional authority for 81 countries in North America, Europe, Latin America, Asia and the Pacific between 1950 and 2010. The second theorizes how regional governance is shaped by functional and communal pressures. These pressures are detected in many historical episodes of jurisdictional reform. These books seek to pin them down empirically. Community and efficiency appear to have tangible and contrasting effects that explain how jurisdictions are designed, why regional governance has become differentiated and how multilevel governance has deepened over the past several decades. The symposium consists of contributions by Kent Eaton, Jean-Paul Faguet and Imke Harbers followed by a response from the authors: Liesbet Hooghe, Gary Marks, Arjan H. Schakel, Sara Niedzwiecki, Sandra Chapman Osterkatz and Sarah Shair-Rosenfield, Measuring Regional Authority: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance, Vol. I. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016; and Liesbet Hooghe and Gary Marks, with Arjan H. Schakel, Sara Niedzwiecki, Sandra Chapman Osterkatz and Sarah Shair-Rosenfield, Community, Scale, and Regional Governance: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance, Vol. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.

KW - DECENTRALIZATION

KW - SUPPORT

KW - community

KW - decentralization

KW - multilevel governance

KW - regions

KW - scale

U2 - 10.1080/21622671.2018.1445021

DO - 10.1080/21622671.2018.1445021

M3 - Review article

VL - 7

SP - 265

EP - 283

JO - Territory, Politics, Governance

JF - Territory, Politics, Governance

SN - 2162-2671

IS - 2

ER -