May the force be with you: The legal classification of intervention by invitation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

It is a truth universally acknowledged that states can consent to the military presence of other states on their territory. This is better known as intervention by invitation. Yet many issues surrounding this concept remain unclear or are too easily accepted, e.g. its name and its place within the rules of jus ad bellum. This article seeks to clarify and resolve these issues. First, an analysis is conducted into what the two terms intervention and invitation actually entail. The term intervention is contrasted with the use of force and the entire concept of intervention by invitation is differentiated from collective self-defence. It is concluded that the threshold of force has been met and thus the focus should be placed on the rules regulating this field of law, rather than the rules of non-intervention. The concept would be more aptly labelled as the use of force by invitation. Second, this article examines where intervention by invitation finds its place in relation to the prohibition of the use of force. Alternative perspectives are investigated encompassing the scope of Article 2(4) UN Charter and the circumstances precluding wrongfulness under the rules of state responsibility, of which consent is of particular relevance here. This article concludes that intervention by invitation falls outside the scope of Article 2(4) as the force is not used within international relations. The prohibition of the use of force therefore does not apply to intervention by invitation. Consequently, an action of intervention by invitation is legal.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21-45
Number of pages25
JournalNetherlands International Law Review
Volume66
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2019

Keywords

  • (Prohibition of the) use of force
  • ARTICLES
  • CONSENT
  • Circumstances precluding wrongfulness
  • Collective self-defence
  • Consent
  • INTERNATIONAL-LAW
  • Intervention by invitation
  • Jus ad bellum
  • MILITARY-INTERVENTION
  • PART
  • PRINCIPLE
  • RESPONSIBILITY
  • WRONGFULNESS

Cite this

@article{ceeb919e93614c84b8aad3d7347ebade,
title = "May the force be with you: The legal classification of intervention by invitation",
abstract = "It is a truth universally acknowledged that states can consent to the military presence of other states on their territory. This is better known as intervention by invitation. Yet many issues surrounding this concept remain unclear or are too easily accepted, e.g. its name and its place within the rules of jus ad bellum. This article seeks to clarify and resolve these issues. First, an analysis is conducted into what the two terms intervention and invitation actually entail. The term intervention is contrasted with the use of force and the entire concept of intervention by invitation is differentiated from collective self-defence. It is concluded that the threshold of force has been met and thus the focus should be placed on the rules regulating this field of law, rather than the rules of non-intervention. The concept would be more aptly labelled as the use of force by invitation. Second, this article examines where intervention by invitation finds its place in relation to the prohibition of the use of force. Alternative perspectives are investigated encompassing the scope of Article 2(4) UN Charter and the circumstances precluding wrongfulness under the rules of state responsibility, of which consent is of particular relevance here. This article concludes that intervention by invitation falls outside the scope of Article 2(4) as the force is not used within international relations. The prohibition of the use of force therefore does not apply to intervention by invitation. Consequently, an action of intervention by invitation is legal.",
keywords = "(Prohibition of the) use of force, ARTICLES, CONSENT, Circumstances precluding wrongfulness, Collective self-defence, Consent, INTERNATIONAL-LAW, Intervention by invitation, Jus ad bellum, MILITARY-INTERVENTION, PART, PRINCIPLE, RESPONSIBILITY, WRONGFULNESS",
author = "Laura Visser",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s40802-019-00133-7",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "21--45",
journal = "Netherlands International Law Review",
issn = "0165-070X",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",

}

May the force be with you: The legal classification of intervention by invitation. / Visser, Laura.

In: Netherlands International Law Review, Vol. 66, No. 1, 04.2019, p. 21-45.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - May the force be with you: The legal classification of intervention by invitation

AU - Visser, Laura

PY - 2019/4

Y1 - 2019/4

N2 - It is a truth universally acknowledged that states can consent to the military presence of other states on their territory. This is better known as intervention by invitation. Yet many issues surrounding this concept remain unclear or are too easily accepted, e.g. its name and its place within the rules of jus ad bellum. This article seeks to clarify and resolve these issues. First, an analysis is conducted into what the two terms intervention and invitation actually entail. The term intervention is contrasted with the use of force and the entire concept of intervention by invitation is differentiated from collective self-defence. It is concluded that the threshold of force has been met and thus the focus should be placed on the rules regulating this field of law, rather than the rules of non-intervention. The concept would be more aptly labelled as the use of force by invitation. Second, this article examines where intervention by invitation finds its place in relation to the prohibition of the use of force. Alternative perspectives are investigated encompassing the scope of Article 2(4) UN Charter and the circumstances precluding wrongfulness under the rules of state responsibility, of which consent is of particular relevance here. This article concludes that intervention by invitation falls outside the scope of Article 2(4) as the force is not used within international relations. The prohibition of the use of force therefore does not apply to intervention by invitation. Consequently, an action of intervention by invitation is legal.

AB - It is a truth universally acknowledged that states can consent to the military presence of other states on their territory. This is better known as intervention by invitation. Yet many issues surrounding this concept remain unclear or are too easily accepted, e.g. its name and its place within the rules of jus ad bellum. This article seeks to clarify and resolve these issues. First, an analysis is conducted into what the two terms intervention and invitation actually entail. The term intervention is contrasted with the use of force and the entire concept of intervention by invitation is differentiated from collective self-defence. It is concluded that the threshold of force has been met and thus the focus should be placed on the rules regulating this field of law, rather than the rules of non-intervention. The concept would be more aptly labelled as the use of force by invitation. Second, this article examines where intervention by invitation finds its place in relation to the prohibition of the use of force. Alternative perspectives are investigated encompassing the scope of Article 2(4) UN Charter and the circumstances precluding wrongfulness under the rules of state responsibility, of which consent is of particular relevance here. This article concludes that intervention by invitation falls outside the scope of Article 2(4) as the force is not used within international relations. The prohibition of the use of force therefore does not apply to intervention by invitation. Consequently, an action of intervention by invitation is legal.

KW - (Prohibition of the) use of force

KW - ARTICLES

KW - CONSENT

KW - Circumstances precluding wrongfulness

KW - Collective self-defence

KW - Consent

KW - INTERNATIONAL-LAW

KW - Intervention by invitation

KW - Jus ad bellum

KW - MILITARY-INTERVENTION

KW - PART

KW - PRINCIPLE

KW - RESPONSIBILITY

KW - WRONGFULNESS

U2 - 10.1007/s40802-019-00133-7

DO - 10.1007/s40802-019-00133-7

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 21

EP - 45

JO - Netherlands International Law Review

JF - Netherlands International Law Review

SN - 0165-070X

IS - 1

ER -