TY - JOUR
T1 - Maximal inspiratory pressure and exercise-induced inspiratory muscle fatigue in chronic nonspecific low back pain
AU - Klaps, Sim
AU - Verbrugghe, Jonas
AU - Goossens, Nina
AU - Meus, Timo
AU - Köke, Albère
AU - Verbunt, Jeanine
AU - Langer, Daniel
AU - Timmermans, Annick
AU - Janssens, Lotte
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP) show reduced inspiratory muscle function. However, studies comparing maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and exercise-induced inspiratory muscle fatigue (IMF) between CNSLBP and healthy controls (HC) are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To compare MIP and exercise-induced IMF between CNSLBP and HC. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: MIP was recorded in 25 persons with CNSLBP and 15 HC before and immediately, 15 and 30 minutes after a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test. Inspiratory muscle weakness was defined as a predicted MIP value lower than 80%, and exercise-induced IMF as a =10% reduction in MIP following the exercise test. RESULTS: Baseline MIP was similar between CNSLBP (109±32 cmH2O) and HC (116±32 cmH2O) (p= 0.525). Inspiratory muscle weakness was present in 36% of the CNSLBP group and in 20% of the HC group, with no significant difference between groups (p= 0.777). None of the groups showed significant exercise-induced IMF immediately (CNSLBP: -2.1%, HC: 3.7%), 15 minutes (CNSLBP: -5.4%, HC: -5.2%), and 30 minutes (CNSLBP: -4.7%, HC: -6.6%) after the maximal exercise test (p> 0.05), with no between group differences with regard to magnitude and proportion (CNSLBP: 24%, HC: 33%) (p> 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that there is no difference in MIP and the proportion of inspiratory muscle weakness between persons with CNSLBP and HC. Additionally, within both groups, there was no exercise-induced IMF immediately, 15 and 30 minutes after a maximal exercise test. Furthermore, there was no difference in the magnitude and proportion of exercise-induced IMF between both groups.
AB - BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP) show reduced inspiratory muscle function. However, studies comparing maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and exercise-induced inspiratory muscle fatigue (IMF) between CNSLBP and healthy controls (HC) are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To compare MIP and exercise-induced IMF between CNSLBP and HC. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: MIP was recorded in 25 persons with CNSLBP and 15 HC before and immediately, 15 and 30 minutes after a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test. Inspiratory muscle weakness was defined as a predicted MIP value lower than 80%, and exercise-induced IMF as a =10% reduction in MIP following the exercise test. RESULTS: Baseline MIP was similar between CNSLBP (109±32 cmH2O) and HC (116±32 cmH2O) (p= 0.525). Inspiratory muscle weakness was present in 36% of the CNSLBP group and in 20% of the HC group, with no significant difference between groups (p= 0.777). None of the groups showed significant exercise-induced IMF immediately (CNSLBP: -2.1%, HC: 3.7%), 15 minutes (CNSLBP: -5.4%, HC: -5.2%), and 30 minutes (CNSLBP: -4.7%, HC: -6.6%) after the maximal exercise test (p> 0.05), with no between group differences with regard to magnitude and proportion (CNSLBP: 24%, HC: 33%) (p> 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that there is no difference in MIP and the proportion of inspiratory muscle weakness between persons with CNSLBP and HC. Additionally, within both groups, there was no exercise-induced IMF immediately, 15 and 30 minutes after a maximal exercise test. Furthermore, there was no difference in the magnitude and proportion of exercise-induced IMF between both groups.
KW - Cross-Sectional Study
KW - Exercise Performance
KW - Inspiratory Muscle Fatigue
KW - Low Back Pain
KW - Musculoskeletal Pain
KW - Respiratory Muscles
U2 - 10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107887
DO - 10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107887
M3 - Article
SN - 0954-6111
VL - 236
JO - Respiratory Medicine
JF - Respiratory Medicine
M1 - 107887
ER -