Making the Rules of Sports Fairer

Steven J. Brams*, Mehmet S. Ismail

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The rules of many sports are not fair-they do not ensure that equally skilled competitors have the same probability of winning. As an example, the penalty shootout in soccer, wherein a coin toss determines which team kicks first on all five penalty kicks, gives a substantial advantage to the first-kicking team, both in theory and in practice. We show that a so-called Catch-Up Rule for determining the order of kicking would not only make the shootout fairer but is also essentially strategyproof. By contrast, the so-called Standard Rule now used for the tiebreaker in tennis is fair. We briefly consider several other sports, all of which involve scoring a sufficient number of points to win, and show how they could benefit from certain rule changes which would be straightforward to implement.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)181-202
Number of pages22
JournalSiam Review
Volume60
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2018

Keywords

  • sports rules
  • fairness
  • strategyproofness
  • Markov process
  • soccer
  • tennis
  • COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENTS EVIDENCE
  • PSYCHOLOGICAL PRESSURE
  • NATURAL EXPERIMENT
  • FOOTBALL

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Making the Rules of Sports Fairer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this