Making genetics not so important: Family work in dealing with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Els Geelen*, Ine Van Hoyweghen, Klasien Horstman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

22 Citations (Web of Science)


The literature shows that genetic testing could stimulate solidarity among family members, but also lead to major conflicts. To prevent negative effects, clinical geneticists and ethicists have stressed the importance of 'good communication' within families. In this qualitative study, we followed six extended families in the southern and eastern Netherlands involved in genetic testing for familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy for three and a half years. In total 57 members of these families were interviewed in depth, most more than once. Our analysis shows that genetic testing does affect families, but that families perform a lot of 'balancing work' in order to prevent genetic testing from becoming too all-encompassing. There is much more continuity in family life than is often thought. Moreover, as these families demonstrate different styles of family work, establishing a single norm of 'good communication' in clinical genetics might in fact be more harmful for family life than genetic testing itself.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1752-1759
JournalSocial Science & Medicine
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2011


  • New genetics
  • Family work
  • Familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
  • Communication
  • The Netherlands
  • Genetic testing

Cite this