Long-Term Treatment Outcomes of Micropulse Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation in Primary and Secondary Glaucoma: A 5-Year Analysis

Ronald M. P. C. de Crom*, Stefani Kujovic-Aleksov, Carroll A. B. Webers, Tos T. J. M. Berendschot, Henny J. M. Beckers

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

IntroductionTo investigate 5-year outcomes on intraocular pressure (IOP) and safety of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (TSCPC) in patients with glaucoma. MethodsPatients with mild to advanced glaucoma who underwent a standardized micropulse TSCPC procedure at the University Eye Clinic Maastricht from November 2016 to February 2019 were included. ResultsA total of 165 eyes were included, with outcomes for 112 eyes available after 5-year follow-up. Mean age was 67.3 +/- 13.9 years; 58.2% were male. Glaucoma subtypes were primary glaucoma (n = 108) and secondary glaucoma (n = 57). Prior glaucoma surgery was performed in 65 of 165 eyes (39.4%). In the primary glaucoma group, mean preoperative IOP was 20.7 +/- 7.1 mmHg. Mean postoperative IOP at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years significantly reduced to 15.2 +/- 6.5, 14.3 +/- 5.0, 14.0 +/- 4.9, 13.5 +/- 4.1, and 12.9 +/- 4.3 mmHg, respectively. Preoperatively, the mean number of IOP-lowering medications was 3.3 +/- 1.3, which changed to 2.8 +/- 1.3, 2.8 +/- 1.2, 2.8 +/- 1.2, 2.9 +/- 1.2, and 2.7 +/- 1.3 at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively. In the secondary glaucoma group, mean preoperative IOP was 28.7 +/- 10.3 mmHg, dropping significantly to 19.3 +/- 10.4, 18.6 +/- 11.3, 17.8 +/- 9.8, 18.1 +/- 12.0, and 15.5 +/- 7.6 mmHg at the same intervals. The number of IOP-lowering medication was significantly reduced from 3.5 +/- 1.1 to 2.5 +/- 1.5, 2.2 +/- 1.5, 2.6 +/- 1.4, 2.6 +/- 1.5, and 2.5 +/- 1.7. In the total group, mean IOP reduction was 32.5% after 5 years. Postoperative complications included cystic macular edema (n = 3), fibrinous/uveitic reaction (n = 1), and rejection of corneal graft (n = 2), all reversible after treatment. One patient developed late and persisting hypotony. Other adverse events were retinal venous occlusion (n = 1) and retinal vasculitis (n = 1), unrelated to the laser treatment. In patients with a preoperative Central Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA) > 0.05 on the Snellen chart, more than two lines of visual acuity (VA) loss were attributed to cataract (n = 10), retinal disease (n = 5), glaucoma progression (n = 3), corneal decompensation (n = 2), or other factors (n = 11). ConclusionMicropulse TSCPC is a safe and effective treatment for reducing IOP and the number of IOP-lowering medications after a 5-year follow-up period. It is a viable alternative for patients after failed incisional glaucoma surgery or high-risk patients.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)323-335
Number of pages13
JournalOphthalmology and Therapy
Volume14
Issue number2
Early online date1 Dec 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2025

Keywords

  • Glaucoma
  • Laser treatment
  • Micropulse
  • Transscleral cyclophotocoagulation
  • DIODE-LASER CYCLOPHOTOCOAGULATION

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Long-Term Treatment Outcomes of Micropulse Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation in Primary and Secondary Glaucoma: A 5-Year Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this