TY - JOUR
T1 - Long-Term Loss of Alignment Following ASD Surgery in the Absence of Mechanical Complications
T2 - Aging Spine?
AU - Haddad, Sleiman
AU - Jacobs, Eva
AU - Núñez Pereira, Susana
AU - Ruiz de Villa, Aleix
AU - Pupak, Anika
AU - Barcheni, Maggie
AU - Ramírez Valencia, Manuel
AU - Pizones, Javier
AU - Kleinstück, Frank S
AU - Pérez Grueso, Francisco Sánchez
AU - Alanay, Ahmet
AU - Obeid, Ibrahim
AU - Pellisé, Ferran
AU - European Spine Study Group
PY - 2024/9/5
Y1 - 2024/9/5
N2 - STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a prospective multicenter Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) registry. OBJECTIVE: Assess whether spinal alignment deteriorates post-surgery in absence of mechanical complications and evaluate the long-term outcomes of ASD surgery over a five-year period. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ASD is prevalent among older adults, leading to significant pain and disability. Surgical intervention, although increasingly popular, is associated with complications, high costs, and uncertain long-term outcomes beyond two years. Mechanical failure and alignment loss often necessitate revision surgeries, but the natural progression of spinal alignment post-surgery without complications remains unclear. METHODS: Clinical and radiological data were analyzed from surgical patients in a multicenter ASD registry who maintained alignment within the instrumented region and completed a 5-year follow-up. The study evaluated patient demographics, surgical details, radiological parameters, and quality of life (QoL) outcomes. Sub-analyses were conducted to compare patients with different initial postoperative alignments and fixation levels. RESULTS: The study included 79 patients (83.5% women, average age 61.9 years) with a mean of 10.7 fused levels. Of these, 29.1% underwent three-column osteotomies (3CO), and 88.6% had a posterior-only approach. While 65% showed favorable alignment at 6 weeks post-surgery, there was a progressive deterioration in global sagittal alignment (Global Tilt/RSA) and thoracic kyphosis over five years (P<0.05), along with increased pelvic compensation (PT SS/RPV). These changes did not correlate with worsening Health-Related Quality of Life outcomes (P>0.05). Older age was linked to greater progression in T2-T12 kyphosis, and osteoporosis was associated with increased SVA and RPV. Optimal immediate postoperative sagittal alignment did not prevent this "aging effect." CONCLUSIONS: ASD surgery and achieving ideal postoperative alignment do not prevent the ongoing "aging" of the non-instrumented spine. Both thoracic and global sagittal alignments deteriorate over time. Although no functional decline has been observed, the implications of these changes for surgical planning remain uncertain.
AB - STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a prospective multicenter Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) registry. OBJECTIVE: Assess whether spinal alignment deteriorates post-surgery in absence of mechanical complications and evaluate the long-term outcomes of ASD surgery over a five-year period. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ASD is prevalent among older adults, leading to significant pain and disability. Surgical intervention, although increasingly popular, is associated with complications, high costs, and uncertain long-term outcomes beyond two years. Mechanical failure and alignment loss often necessitate revision surgeries, but the natural progression of spinal alignment post-surgery without complications remains unclear. METHODS: Clinical and radiological data were analyzed from surgical patients in a multicenter ASD registry who maintained alignment within the instrumented region and completed a 5-year follow-up. The study evaluated patient demographics, surgical details, radiological parameters, and quality of life (QoL) outcomes. Sub-analyses were conducted to compare patients with different initial postoperative alignments and fixation levels. RESULTS: The study included 79 patients (83.5% women, average age 61.9 years) with a mean of 10.7 fused levels. Of these, 29.1% underwent three-column osteotomies (3CO), and 88.6% had a posterior-only approach. While 65% showed favorable alignment at 6 weeks post-surgery, there was a progressive deterioration in global sagittal alignment (Global Tilt/RSA) and thoracic kyphosis over five years (P<0.05), along with increased pelvic compensation (PT SS/RPV). These changes did not correlate with worsening Health-Related Quality of Life outcomes (P>0.05). Older age was linked to greater progression in T2-T12 kyphosis, and osteoporosis was associated with increased SVA and RPV. Optimal immediate postoperative sagittal alignment did not prevent this "aging effect." CONCLUSIONS: ASD surgery and achieving ideal postoperative alignment do not prevent the ongoing "aging" of the non-instrumented spine. Both thoracic and global sagittal alignments deteriorate over time. Although no functional decline has been observed, the implications of these changes for surgical planning remain uncertain.
U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005142
DO - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005142
M3 - Article
SN - 0362-2436
JO - Spine
JF - Spine
ER -