Long-Term Follow-Up of Critically Ill Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: from intensive care parameters to patient and caregiver-reported outcome

Anne-Fleur Domensino*, Jeanette Tas, Babette Donners, Joyce Kooyman, Iwan van der Horst, Roel Haeren, Marcel Aries, Caroline Heugten*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

17 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with a high social and financial burden due to persisting (severe) disabilities. The consequences of TBI after intensive care unit (ICU) admission are generally measured with global disability screeners such as the Glasgow Outcome Scale–Extended (GOSE), which may lack precision. To improve outcome measurement after brain injury, a comprehensive clinical outcome assessment tool called the Minimal Dataset for Acquired Brain Injury (MDS-ABI) was recently developed. The MDS-ABI covers 12 life domains (demographics, injury characteristics, comorbidity, cognitive functioning, emotional functioning, energy, mobility, self-care, communication, participation, social support, and quality of life), as well as informal caregiver capacity and strain. In this cross-sectional study, we used the MDS-ABI among formerly ICU admitted patients with TBI to explore the relationship between dichotomized severity of TBI and long-term outcome. Our objectives were to: 1) summarize demographics, clinical characteristics, and long-term outcomes of patients and their informal caregivers, and 2) compare differences between long-term outcomes in patients with mild-moderate TBI and severe TBI based on Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores at admission. Participants were former patients of a Dutch university hospital (total n = 52; mild-moderate TBI n = 23; severe TBI n = 29) and their informal caregivers (n = 45). Hospital records were evaluated, and the MDS-ABI was administered during a home visit. On average 3.2 years after their TBI, 62% of the patients were cognitively impaired, 62% reported elevated fatigue, and 69% experienced restrictions in ‡2 participation domains (most frequently work or education and going out). Informal caregivers generally felt competent to provide necessary care (81%), but 31% experienced a disproportionate caregiver burden. All but four patients lived at home independently, often together with their informal caregiver (81%). Although the mild-moderate TBI group and the severe TBI group had significantly different clinical trajectories, there were no persisting differences between the groups for patient or caregiver outcomes at follow-up. As a large proportion of the patients experienced long-lasting consequences beyond global disability or independent living, clinicians should implement a multi-domain outcome set such as the MDS-AB to follow up on their patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)123-134
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Neurotrauma
Volume41
Issue number1-2
Early online date2 Jun 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2024

Keywords

  • ASSESSMENT TOOLS
  • NEUROPSYCHOLOGY
  • OUTCOME MEASURES
  • TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Long-Term Follow-Up of Critically Ill Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: from intensive care parameters to patient and caregiver-reported outcome'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this