Lockdown and Unrest: Inequality, Restrictions and Protests During COVID-19

Francesco Iacoella, Patricia Justino, Bruno Martorano*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper analyses how pre-pandemic levels of inequality across US counties have shaped the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence of protests. The results from difference-in-differences and instrumental variable models using high-frequency weekly data show that more stringent measures to contain the pandemic increased the incidence of protests, but only in US counties with high levels of inequality before the start of the pandemic where grievances may have been initially stronger. The impact of government responses to COVID-19 on protests is largely explained by adverse changes in economic conditions in counties with the highest levels of pre-pandemic inequality. Policy stringency measures were also associated with more protests in the most unequal counties which voted for the Republican party in the 2016 elections and exhibited, at the start of the pandemic, lower levels of trust in the president and lower satisfaction with democracy.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages31
JournalJournal of Conflict Resolution
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 1 Oct 2024

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • lockdown
  • stringency policies
  • protests
  • inequality
  • D30
  • D63
  • D70
  • H12
  • I18
  • ECONOMIC-INEQUALITY
  • TRUST
  • CONFLICT
  • EUROPE
  • EBOLA

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lockdown and Unrest: Inequality, Restrictions and Protests During COVID-19'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this