Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Legitimacy: What’s in a Name?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Academic

17 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This introductory chapter presents a blueprint for examining how courts and quasi-judicial bodies contribute to the legitimacy of EU environmental governance. It proposes a series of questions structuring an inquiry into the role of judicial decision-making in a broader environmental governance framework. The questions are based on the assumption that courts provide ‘throughput’ legitimacy by holding public authorities to account for their decisions. The questions focus on, first, the institutional and procedural capacity of courts to act as accountability fora, second, on the values that the judicial process fosters, and, third, on the outcome of the judicial process, including its long-term contribution to environmental protection. The following chapters of this volume put this blueprint into practice, thereby fleshing out the judicial contribution to the legitimacy of EU environmental governance.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLegitimacy of Eu Environmental Governance and the Role of the European Courts
EditorsMariolina Eliantonio, Emma Lees
Place of PublicationOxford
PublisherOxford University Press
Chapter1
Pages1-20
Number of pages20
ISBN (Electronic)9780198972839
ISBN (Print)9780198972808
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Jul 2025

Publication series

SeriesCollected Courses of the Academy of European Law

Keywords

  • accountability fora
  • courts
  • environmental governance
  • environmental protection
  • judicial decision-making
  • judicial process
  • legitimacy
  • quasi-judicial bodies
  • throughput legitimacy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Legitimacy: What’s in a Name?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this