Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Kun je de Kelderluikfactoren betrouwbaar herkennen in rechtspraak?

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

The ‘Kelderluikcriteria’ (criteria for assessing negligence, dangerous situations in particular) are familiar to many Dutch legal scholars, but can they be identified in case law? This question matters for several purposes, including determining when specific factors are applied, improving retrieval of judgments involving the Kelderluikcriteria and assessing whether judges apply them consistently. Before such analyses can be conducted, it must be established whether the factors can be identified reliably. This article examines this question using an empirical method: measuring agreement between independent annotators who identify and label the Kelderluikcriteria in case law. The results suggest that acceptable agreement can be achieved for most.
Original languageDutch
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalLaw and Method
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2026

Keywords

  • empirisch
  • Kelderluikfactoren
  • empirical legal studies
  • gevaarzetting
  • interbeoordelingsbetrouwbaarheid

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Kun je de Kelderluikfactoren betrouwbaar herkennen in rechtspraak?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this