Judicial control of the politics of differentiated integration

Bruno de Witte*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademic

Abstract

This chapter examines to what extent the Court of Justice of the European Union has contributed to shape, through its case law, the legal feasibility (and therefore also the political attractivity) of the various modes of differentiated integration (opt-outs for single countries, enhanced cooperation, and international agreements between groups of EU states). The Court has traditionally sought to restrict the possibility for single Member States to derogate from common European legal norms. By contrast, it has generally supported the recourse to differentiated integration by large groups of Member States when such initiatives, in the Court’s opinion, contribute to advance the European integration process.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationRevisiting Judicial Politics in the European Union
EditorsMark Dawson, Bruno de Witte, Elise Muir
Place of PublicationCheltenham
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing
Pages269-281
Number of pages13
ISBN (Electronic)9781035313518
ISBN (Print)9781035313501
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Mar 2024

Keywords

  • enhanced cooperation
  • derogations
  • bilateral agreements
  • pringle judgment
  • Economic and Monetary Union
  • opt-outs

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Judicial control of the politics of differentiated integration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this