It was not me: attribution of blame for criminal acts in psychiatric offenders

M J. Cima, H.L.G.J. Merckelbach, C. Butt, K. Kremer, E. Knauer, R. Schellbach-Matties

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current article addresses the psychometric qualities of the German Version of Gudjonsson's Blame Attribution Inventory (GBAI), a self-report scale for measuring attribution of blame for crime. The GBAI was administered to a criminal sample of forensic and criminal inmates (n = 107). Findings indicate that the German version of the Gudjonsson's Blame Attribution Inventory possesses acceptable test-retest stability and good internal consistency. Factor analysis reproduced the three basic dimensions of the GBAI external attribution, mental-element attribution, and guilt-feeling attribution. Forensic patients had higher mental-element attribution and guilt-feeling attribution scores than the prison inmates. Interestingly, sexual offenders who were prisoners, showed the lowest guilt-feeling attribution, while sexual offenders who were forensic patients had the highest guilt-feeling attribution scores. Since earlier research reported a tendency of faking good in sexual offenders, we suggest that the forensic sexual offenders may demonstrate a social desirable response tendency in an attempt to gain sympathy and/or earlier parole. All in all, our data show that the German version of the GBAI is a valuable tool for measuring attributional styles of offenders.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)143-147
JournalForensic Science International
Volume168
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2007

Cite this

Cima, M J. ; Merckelbach, H.L.G.J. ; Butt, C. ; Kremer, K. ; Knauer, E. ; Schellbach-Matties, R. / It was not me: attribution of blame for criminal acts in psychiatric offenders. In: Forensic Science International. 2007 ; Vol. 168, No. 2-3. pp. 143-147.
@article{1e42604c70af4357934bdafebfa9439f,
title = "It was not me: attribution of blame for criminal acts in psychiatric offenders",
abstract = "The current article addresses the psychometric qualities of the German Version of Gudjonsson's Blame Attribution Inventory (GBAI), a self-report scale for measuring attribution of blame for crime. The GBAI was administered to a criminal sample of forensic and criminal inmates (n = 107). Findings indicate that the German version of the Gudjonsson's Blame Attribution Inventory possesses acceptable test-retest stability and good internal consistency. Factor analysis reproduced the three basic dimensions of the GBAI external attribution, mental-element attribution, and guilt-feeling attribution. Forensic patients had higher mental-element attribution and guilt-feeling attribution scores than the prison inmates. Interestingly, sexual offenders who were prisoners, showed the lowest guilt-feeling attribution, while sexual offenders who were forensic patients had the highest guilt-feeling attribution scores. Since earlier research reported a tendency of faking good in sexual offenders, we suggest that the forensic sexual offenders may demonstrate a social desirable response tendency in an attempt to gain sympathy and/or earlier parole. All in all, our data show that the German version of the GBAI is a valuable tool for measuring attributional styles of offenders.",
author = "Cima, {M J.} and H.L.G.J. Merckelbach and C. Butt and K. Kremer and E. Knauer and R. Schellbach-Matties",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.07.004",
language = "English",
volume = "168",
pages = "143--147",
journal = "Forensic Science International",
issn = "0379-0738",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2-3",

}

It was not me: attribution of blame for criminal acts in psychiatric offenders. / Cima, M J.; Merckelbach, H.L.G.J.; Butt, C.; Kremer, K.; Knauer, E.; Schellbach-Matties, R.

In: Forensic Science International, Vol. 168, No. 2-3, 01.01.2007, p. 143-147.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - It was not me: attribution of blame for criminal acts in psychiatric offenders

AU - Cima, M J.

AU - Merckelbach, H.L.G.J.

AU - Butt, C.

AU - Kremer, K.

AU - Knauer, E.

AU - Schellbach-Matties, R.

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - The current article addresses the psychometric qualities of the German Version of Gudjonsson's Blame Attribution Inventory (GBAI), a self-report scale for measuring attribution of blame for crime. The GBAI was administered to a criminal sample of forensic and criminal inmates (n = 107). Findings indicate that the German version of the Gudjonsson's Blame Attribution Inventory possesses acceptable test-retest stability and good internal consistency. Factor analysis reproduced the three basic dimensions of the GBAI external attribution, mental-element attribution, and guilt-feeling attribution. Forensic patients had higher mental-element attribution and guilt-feeling attribution scores than the prison inmates. Interestingly, sexual offenders who were prisoners, showed the lowest guilt-feeling attribution, while sexual offenders who were forensic patients had the highest guilt-feeling attribution scores. Since earlier research reported a tendency of faking good in sexual offenders, we suggest that the forensic sexual offenders may demonstrate a social desirable response tendency in an attempt to gain sympathy and/or earlier parole. All in all, our data show that the German version of the GBAI is a valuable tool for measuring attributional styles of offenders.

AB - The current article addresses the psychometric qualities of the German Version of Gudjonsson's Blame Attribution Inventory (GBAI), a self-report scale for measuring attribution of blame for crime. The GBAI was administered to a criminal sample of forensic and criminal inmates (n = 107). Findings indicate that the German version of the Gudjonsson's Blame Attribution Inventory possesses acceptable test-retest stability and good internal consistency. Factor analysis reproduced the three basic dimensions of the GBAI external attribution, mental-element attribution, and guilt-feeling attribution. Forensic patients had higher mental-element attribution and guilt-feeling attribution scores than the prison inmates. Interestingly, sexual offenders who were prisoners, showed the lowest guilt-feeling attribution, while sexual offenders who were forensic patients had the highest guilt-feeling attribution scores. Since earlier research reported a tendency of faking good in sexual offenders, we suggest that the forensic sexual offenders may demonstrate a social desirable response tendency in an attempt to gain sympathy and/or earlier parole. All in all, our data show that the German version of the GBAI is a valuable tool for measuring attributional styles of offenders.

U2 - 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.07.004

DO - 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.07.004

M3 - Article

VL - 168

SP - 143

EP - 147

JO - Forensic Science International

JF - Forensic Science International

SN - 0379-0738

IS - 2-3

ER -