Issue congruence in international organizations: A study of World Bank spending

Mirko Heinzel, Bernhard Reinsberg*, Giuseppe Zaccaria

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

International organizations (IOs) are often criticized for insulated decision-making processes that do not react to the preferences of key stakeholders that are directly affected by them. However, empirical studies probing the degree to which IOs' policies are aligned with the preferences of such key constituencies are scarce. This paper tackles the gap by studying the case of the World Bank. We argue that congruence with stakeholder preferences increases when recipients have institutional means of participation and decreases when donors restrict the purposes of their funds. We utilize survey data from 269 stakeholder surveys conducted in 114 countries between 2012 and 2022 for our empirical analysis. Our findings carry important implications for the responsiveness of IOs to stakeholders in low- and middle-income countries.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)855-868
Number of pages14
JournalGlobal Policy
Volume15
Issue number5
Early online date27 Aug 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2024

Keywords

  • EUROPEAN-UNION EVIDENCE
  • GOVERNMENT RESPONSIVENESS
  • INSTITUTIONAL DESIGN
  • INFORMAL INFLUENCE
  • FUNDING RULES
  • LEGITIMACY
  • AGENCY
  • POWER
  • AID

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Issue congruence in international organizations: A study of World Bank spending'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this