Is specimen radiography still necessary in patients with non-palpable breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery using radioactive I-125 seed localization?

Y.E. van Riet, R.J. Schipper*, F. van Merrienboer, R.G. Orsini, J.G. Bloemen, F.H. Jansen, G.A.P. Nieuwenhuijzen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the diagnostic performance for margin assessment of specimen radiography (SR) in breast conserving surgery (BCS) using radioactive I-125-seed localization (RSL).Methods: The clinical, radiographic and histopathological data of women who underwent BCS after pre-operative RSL with intraoperative SR during nine consecutive years were analyzed. The histological margin and radiographic margin outcomes on SR were compared and results of intraoperative re-excisions were investigated.Results: A consecutive series of 448 women with invasive carcinoma (n = 211), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (n = 79) and a combination of DCIS and invasive carcinoma (n = 158) were included. The median minimal margins for the radiological masses and microcalcifications measured on SR were 14 mm and 11 mm, respectively. Based on a radiological cut-off SR margin value of 1 mm, the overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were 21.0%, 95.0%, 26.0%, and 94.0%, respectively. The area under the receiver-operating curve was 0.73. Intraoperative re-excisions based on SR were performed in 31 (6.9%) patients; histopathological examination of the additional excised tissue revealed DCIS or invasive carcinoma in 6 (19.4%) patients. Hence, SR was beneficial for 6/448 patients (1.3%), and unnecessary intraoperative re-excisions were performed in 20/448 patients (4.5%). The number need to treat is 75; this implies that per 75-SR one resection with involved margins is prevented.Conclusion: SR has a moderate diagnostic performance for margin involvement using RSL. A more accurate intraoperative margin assessment tool is warranted.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)311-317
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Imaging
Volume69
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2021

Keywords

  • biopsy
  • breast cancer
  • breast-conserving surgery
  • carcinoma in-situ
  • excision
  • intraoperative margin assessment
  • mammography
  • margin assessment
  • radioactive seed localization
  • recurrence
  • reexcision
  • specimen radiography
  • surgical-treatment
  • wire localization
  • BIOPSY
  • MARGIN ASSESSMENT
  • REEXCISION
  • MAMMOGRAPHY
  • Radioactive seed localization
  • RECURRENCE
  • EXCISION
  • Breast cancer
  • SURGICAL-TREATMENT
  • CARCINOMA IN-SITU
  • WIRE LOCALIZATION
  • Intraoperative margin assessment
  • Breast-conserving surgery
  • Specimen radiography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is specimen radiography still necessary in patients with non-palpable breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving surgery using radioactive I-125 seed localization?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this