Is international election observation credible? Evidence from Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe missions

M. Bader, H. Schmeets

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

While international election observations missions often aim to present generalizable claims about the quality and integrity of an election, their findings are rarely based on a representative sample of observations, undermining the credibility of the missions. Bias in the selection of polling stations, among other things, can inflate or deflate the percentage of polling stations where observers find significant flaws. This article uses original data from organization for security and co-operation in europe (osce) election observation missions to illustrate the nature of the problem of selection bias in international election observation, and show how the percentage of ‘bad’ polling stations (in the absence of selection bias) can be estimated through a weighting procedure. The article finds that, while there is a strong degree of selection bias, this does not significantly impact the overall percentage of ‘bad’ polling stations that is reported by osce observation missions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-6
JournalResearch & Politics
Volume1
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014

Cite this

@article{4fb5d09c6e8642968868a05c55b915bb,
title = "Is international election observation credible? Evidence from Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe missions",
abstract = "While international election observations missions often aim to present generalizable claims about the quality and integrity of an election, their findings are rarely based on a representative sample of observations, undermining the credibility of the missions. Bias in the selection of polling stations, among other things, can inflate or deflate the percentage of polling stations where observers find significant flaws. This article uses original data from organization for security and co-operation in europe (osce) election observation missions to illustrate the nature of the problem of selection bias in international election observation, and show how the percentage of ‘bad’ polling stations (in the absence of selection bias) can be estimated through a weighting procedure. The article finds that, while there is a strong degree of selection bias, this does not significantly impact the overall percentage of ‘bad’ polling stations that is reported by osce observation missions.",
author = "M. Bader and H. Schmeets",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/2053168014541587",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "Research & Politics",
issn = "2053-1680",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Is international election observation credible? Evidence from Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe missions. / Bader, M.; Schmeets, H.

In: Research & Politics, Vol. 1, No. 2, 01.01.2014, p. 1-6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is international election observation credible? Evidence from Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe missions

AU - Bader, M.

AU - Schmeets, H.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - While international election observations missions often aim to present generalizable claims about the quality and integrity of an election, their findings are rarely based on a representative sample of observations, undermining the credibility of the missions. Bias in the selection of polling stations, among other things, can inflate or deflate the percentage of polling stations where observers find significant flaws. This article uses original data from organization for security and co-operation in europe (osce) election observation missions to illustrate the nature of the problem of selection bias in international election observation, and show how the percentage of ‘bad’ polling stations (in the absence of selection bias) can be estimated through a weighting procedure. The article finds that, while there is a strong degree of selection bias, this does not significantly impact the overall percentage of ‘bad’ polling stations that is reported by osce observation missions.

AB - While international election observations missions often aim to present generalizable claims about the quality and integrity of an election, their findings are rarely based on a representative sample of observations, undermining the credibility of the missions. Bias in the selection of polling stations, among other things, can inflate or deflate the percentage of polling stations where observers find significant flaws. This article uses original data from organization for security and co-operation in europe (osce) election observation missions to illustrate the nature of the problem of selection bias in international election observation, and show how the percentage of ‘bad’ polling stations (in the absence of selection bias) can be estimated through a weighting procedure. The article finds that, while there is a strong degree of selection bias, this does not significantly impact the overall percentage of ‘bad’ polling stations that is reported by osce observation missions.

U2 - 10.1177/2053168014541587

DO - 10.1177/2053168014541587

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Research & Politics

JF - Research & Politics

SN - 2053-1680

IS - 2

ER -