TY - JOUR
T1 - Is contrast enhancement required to visualize a known breast tumor in a pre-operative CT scan?
AU - Boersma, Liesbeth J.
AU - Hanbeukers, Bianca
AU - Boetes, Carla
AU - Borger, Jacques
AU - van den Ende, Piet
AU - van Haaren, Els
AU - Houben, Ruud
AU - Jager, Jos
AU - Murrer, Lars
AU - Sastrowijoto, Suprapto H.
AU - van Baardwijk, Angela
PY - 2011/8
Y1 - 2011/8
N2 - Background and purpose: A pre-operative CT scan with contrast enhancement (CE) has recently been proposed to improve tumorbed delineation in breast conserving therapy. However, it is not clear whether CE is required for visualization of a known breast tumor. The main aims of this study were to compare the sensitivity of a CE-CT scan with a native CT scan (i.e. without CE) and to identify characteristics predictive for the requirement of CE. Patients and methods: Both a CE-CT and a native CT were made in 58 breast cancer patients (age 37-75 yr), prior to breast conserving surgery. Visibility of the tumor on CT was scored by three observers (clearly visible/doubtful/not visible). Age, tumor size, palpable tumor yes/no, histology, and visibility on mammography were analyzed with respect to the visibility of the tumor on the native CT. Results: The sensitivity for tumor detection was better for CE-CT (95%) than for native CT (83%) (p <0.001). Only mammographic visibility scores appeared to be significantly correlated with the visibility of the tumor on the native CT (p = 0.013). Conclusion: In most patients CE is not required to visualize a known breast tumor. Mammographic visibility is a good parameter to decide on the use of CE.
AB - Background and purpose: A pre-operative CT scan with contrast enhancement (CE) has recently been proposed to improve tumorbed delineation in breast conserving therapy. However, it is not clear whether CE is required for visualization of a known breast tumor. The main aims of this study were to compare the sensitivity of a CE-CT scan with a native CT scan (i.e. without CE) and to identify characteristics predictive for the requirement of CE. Patients and methods: Both a CE-CT and a native CT were made in 58 breast cancer patients (age 37-75 yr), prior to breast conserving surgery. Visibility of the tumor on CT was scored by three observers (clearly visible/doubtful/not visible). Age, tumor size, palpable tumor yes/no, histology, and visibility on mammography were analyzed with respect to the visibility of the tumor on the native CT. Results: The sensitivity for tumor detection was better for CE-CT (95%) than for native CT (83%) (p <0.001). Only mammographic visibility scores appeared to be significantly correlated with the visibility of the tumor on the native CT (p = 0.013). Conclusion: In most patients CE is not required to visualize a known breast tumor. Mammographic visibility is a good parameter to decide on the use of CE.
KW - Breast conserving therapy
KW - Tumorbed delineation
KW - Pre-operative CT scanning
KW - Contrast-enhancement
KW - Tumor visibility
U2 - 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.06.027
DO - 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.06.027
M3 - Article
C2 - 21741717
SN - 0167-8140
VL - 100
SP - 271
EP - 275
JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology
JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology
IS - 2
ER -