Intranasal administration of a panreactive influenza antibody reveals Fc-independent mode of protection

  • Anna L Beukenhorst*
  • , Keira L Rice
  • , Jacopo Frallicciardi
  • , Martin H Koldijk
  • , Carolyn M Boudreau
  • , Justin Crawford
  • , Lisette A H M Cornelissen
  • , Kelly A S da Costa
  • , Babette A de Jong
  • , Stephanie Fischinger
  • , Boris Julg
  • , Jaco M Klap
  • , Clarissa M Koch
  • , Zoltán Magyarics
  • , Faez A Nait Mohamed
  • , Vintus Okonkwo
  • , Lindsey Adams
  • , Caitlin M McCarthy
  • , Larance Ronsard
  • , Nigel Temperton
  • Helene Vietsch, Kanin Wichapong, Bertjan Ziere, Daniel Lingwood, Jaap Goudsmit
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies have two core mechanisms of protection: an antibody's antigen-binding fragment (Fab) can bind and neutralize viral pathogens and its fragment crystallizable domain (Fc) catalyzes effector functions. We investigated the relative contribution of Fab- versus Fc-mediated mechanisms of protection through passive administration of distinct forms of the pan-reactive anti-influenza antibody CR9114. We demonstrated that the contribution of Fc-independent (Fab-dependent) versus Fc-dependent mechanisms of protection is defined by the route of administration. We used CR9114 variants (wild-type, two Fc-silenced variants, or the bivalent antigen-binding fragment F(ab') ), administered either intravenously or intranasally. We found that intravenously-administered CR9114 requires the Fc domain to provide potent, pre-exposure protection against influenza A and B viral challenge. In contrast, when CR9114 was administered locally to the nasal mucosa, the main mode of protection was provided by F(ab') , and was largely Fc-independent. Importantly, this mode of protection following intranasal administration also applied to non-neutralized influenza B strains. Moreover, intranasal administration resulted in an increase in potency against influenza A/H1N1, A/H5N1, A/H3N2, B/Yam and B/Vic compared to intravenous administration up to 50-fold. These results shed new light on the application of monoclonal antibodies such as CR9114 to combat viral infection locally, and will help inform clinical strategies of pre-exposure prophylaxis. More fundamentally, this study uncovers distinct modes of protection for systemic versus intranasally-administered prophylactic antibodies.
Original languageEnglish
Article number10309
Number of pages14
JournalScientific Reports
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Apr 2025

Keywords

  • Administration, Intranasal
  • Animals
  • Antibodies, Viral/administration & dosage immunology
  • Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments/immunology
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage immunology
  • Mice
  • Orthomyxoviridae Infections/prevention & control immunology virology
  • Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments/immunology administration & dosage
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Influenza B virus/immunology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Intranasal administration of a panreactive influenza antibody reveals Fc-independent mode of protection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this