Interval Colorectal Cancers: What and why

Chantal M C le Clercq, Silvia Sanduleanu*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

An increasing number of studies now indicate that colonoscopic examination is not perfect in preventing colorectal cancer (CRC), especially of the proximal colon. Several factors can be implicated in the occurrence of interval CRCs-further referred to as postcolonoscopy CRCs-, such as missed, incompletely resected lesions and newly developed cancers. Missed lesions represent by far the dominant cause of postcolonoscopy CRCs, with nonpolypoid (flat or depressed) neoplasms and sessile serrated polyps playing a significant role. Molecular events underlying progression of such lesions may further augment the cancer risk. In this article, we review the literature about postcolonoscopy CRC risk and the most common explanations. We discuss potential implications, paying special attention to improvements required in education and training.
Original languageEnglish
Article number375
JournalCurrent Gastroenterology Reports
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interval Colorectal Cancers: What and why'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this