Interrelation of attention and prediction in visual processing: Effects of task-relevance and stimulus probability

Anna Marzecová, Andreas Widmann, Iria SanMiguel, Sonja A. Kotz, Erich Schröger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The potentially interactive influence of attention and prediction was investigated by measuring event-related potentials (ERPs) in a spatial cueing task with attention (task-relevant) and prediction (probabilistic) cues. We identified distinct processing stages of this interactive influence. Firstly, in line with the attentional gain hypothesis, a larger amplitude response of the contralateral N1, and Nd1 for attended gratings was observed. Secondly, conforming to the attenuation-by-prediction hypothesis, a smaller negativity in the time window directly following the peak of the N1 component for predicted compared to unpredicted gratings was observed. In line with the hypothesis that attention and prediction interface, unpredicted/unattended stimuli elicited a larger negativity at central-parietal sites, presumably reflecting an increased prediction error signal. Thirdly, larger P3 responses to unpredicted stimuli pointed to the updating of an internal model. Attention and prediction can be considered as differentiated mechanisms that may interact at different processing stages to optimise perception.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)76-90
Number of pages15
JournalBiological Psychology
Volume125
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2017

Keywords

  • Prediction
  • Attention
  • Visual perception
  • Predictive coding
  • ERP
  • Sensory gain
  • vMMN
  • SENSORY GAIN-CONTROL
  • SPATIAL ATTENTION
  • VISUOSPATIAL ATTENTION
  • MISMATCH NEGATIVITY
  • SELECTIVE ATTENTION
  • BRAIN
  • EXPECTATION
  • STRIATE
  • ALPHA

Cite this

Marzecová, Anna ; Widmann, Andreas ; SanMiguel, Iria ; Kotz, Sonja A. ; Schröger, Erich. / Interrelation of attention and prediction in visual processing : Effects of task-relevance and stimulus probability. In: Biological Psychology. 2017 ; Vol. 125. pp. 76-90.
@article{60033052f3164da8993a38ef4d6f3de8,
title = "Interrelation of attention and prediction in visual processing: Effects of task-relevance and stimulus probability",
abstract = "The potentially interactive influence of attention and prediction was investigated by measuring event-related potentials (ERPs) in a spatial cueing task with attention (task-relevant) and prediction (probabilistic) cues. We identified distinct processing stages of this interactive influence. Firstly, in line with the attentional gain hypothesis, a larger amplitude response of the contralateral N1, and Nd1 for attended gratings was observed. Secondly, conforming to the attenuation-by-prediction hypothesis, a smaller negativity in the time window directly following the peak of the N1 component for predicted compared to unpredicted gratings was observed. In line with the hypothesis that attention and prediction interface, unpredicted/unattended stimuli elicited a larger negativity at central-parietal sites, presumably reflecting an increased prediction error signal. Thirdly, larger P3 responses to unpredicted stimuli pointed to the updating of an internal model. Attention and prediction can be considered as differentiated mechanisms that may interact at different processing stages to optimise perception.",
keywords = "Prediction, Attention, Visual perception, Predictive coding, ERP, Sensory gain, vMMN, SENSORY GAIN-CONTROL, SPATIAL ATTENTION, VISUOSPATIAL ATTENTION, MISMATCH NEGATIVITY, SELECTIVE ATTENTION, BRAIN, EXPECTATION, STRIATE, ALPHA",
author = "Anna Marzecov{\'a} and Andreas Widmann and Iria SanMiguel and Kotz, {Sonja A.} and Erich Schr{\"o}ger",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.02.009",
language = "English",
volume = "125",
pages = "76--90",
journal = "Biological Psychology",
issn = "0301-0511",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",

}

Interrelation of attention and prediction in visual processing : Effects of task-relevance and stimulus probability. / Marzecová, Anna; Widmann, Andreas; SanMiguel, Iria; Kotz, Sonja A.; Schröger, Erich.

In: Biological Psychology, Vol. 125, 04.2017, p. 76-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interrelation of attention and prediction in visual processing

T2 - Effects of task-relevance and stimulus probability

AU - Marzecová, Anna

AU - Widmann, Andreas

AU - SanMiguel, Iria

AU - Kotz, Sonja A.

AU - Schröger, Erich

N1 - Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2017/4

Y1 - 2017/4

N2 - The potentially interactive influence of attention and prediction was investigated by measuring event-related potentials (ERPs) in a spatial cueing task with attention (task-relevant) and prediction (probabilistic) cues. We identified distinct processing stages of this interactive influence. Firstly, in line with the attentional gain hypothesis, a larger amplitude response of the contralateral N1, and Nd1 for attended gratings was observed. Secondly, conforming to the attenuation-by-prediction hypothesis, a smaller negativity in the time window directly following the peak of the N1 component for predicted compared to unpredicted gratings was observed. In line with the hypothesis that attention and prediction interface, unpredicted/unattended stimuli elicited a larger negativity at central-parietal sites, presumably reflecting an increased prediction error signal. Thirdly, larger P3 responses to unpredicted stimuli pointed to the updating of an internal model. Attention and prediction can be considered as differentiated mechanisms that may interact at different processing stages to optimise perception.

AB - The potentially interactive influence of attention and prediction was investigated by measuring event-related potentials (ERPs) in a spatial cueing task with attention (task-relevant) and prediction (probabilistic) cues. We identified distinct processing stages of this interactive influence. Firstly, in line with the attentional gain hypothesis, a larger amplitude response of the contralateral N1, and Nd1 for attended gratings was observed. Secondly, conforming to the attenuation-by-prediction hypothesis, a smaller negativity in the time window directly following the peak of the N1 component for predicted compared to unpredicted gratings was observed. In line with the hypothesis that attention and prediction interface, unpredicted/unattended stimuli elicited a larger negativity at central-parietal sites, presumably reflecting an increased prediction error signal. Thirdly, larger P3 responses to unpredicted stimuli pointed to the updating of an internal model. Attention and prediction can be considered as differentiated mechanisms that may interact at different processing stages to optimise perception.

KW - Prediction

KW - Attention

KW - Visual perception

KW - Predictive coding

KW - ERP

KW - Sensory gain

KW - vMMN

KW - SENSORY GAIN-CONTROL

KW - SPATIAL ATTENTION

KW - VISUOSPATIAL ATTENTION

KW - MISMATCH NEGATIVITY

KW - SELECTIVE ATTENTION

KW - BRAIN

KW - EXPECTATION

KW - STRIATE

KW - ALPHA

U2 - 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.02.009

DO - 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.02.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 28257808

VL - 125

SP - 76

EP - 90

JO - Biological Psychology

JF - Biological Psychology

SN - 0301-0511

ER -