Interrater reliability of two gait performance measures in children with neuromotor disorders across two different settings

Corinne Ammann-Reiffer*, Caroline H. G. Bastiaenen, Rob A. De Bie, Hubertus J. A. Van Hedel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

AIM To examine the interrater agreement of the two gait performance measures - the Functional Mobility Scale (FMS) and Gillette Functional Assessment Questionnaire - walking scale (FAQ) - within health professionals and parents in children with neuromotor disorders, measured in an inpatient setting and at home.

METHOD Seventy-one children with a neuromotor diagnosis (44 males, 27 females; median age 12y 11mo [interquartile range 4y-10mo]) were consecutively recruited when starting an inpatient active gait rehabilitation programme. Physiotherapists and nurses independently scored the level of children's gait performance with the FMS and the FAQ, while parents' scores regarding the children's gait performance at home were obtained by interview or telephone call at the same measurement points.

RESULTS Linear weighted kappa coefficients were substantial to almost perfect for all comparisons. Kappa coefficients ranged from 0.62 to 0.85 for the FMS-5, from 0.79 to 0.92 for the FMS-50, from 0.83 to 0.90 for the FMS-500, and from 0.69 to 0.77 for the FAQ. Friedman tests did not reveal significant differences between the different rater groups.

INTERPRETATION The unexpectedly high level of interrater agreement between parents, physiotherapists, and nurses demonstrates that the FMS and FAQ can reliably assess gait performance in an inpatient setting. Inpatient scores correspond well to the children's performance in their usual environment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1158-1163
Number of pages6
JournalDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology
Volume59
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017

Keywords

  • FUNCTIONAL MOBILITY SCALE
  • CEREBRAL-PALSY
  • OUTCOMES
  • ADOLESCENTS
  • VALIDITY
  • WALKING
  • YOUTH

Cite this