Interference resolution moderates the impact of rumination and reappraisal on affective experiences in daily life

Madeline Lee Pe*, Filip Raes, Peter Koval, Karen Brans, Philippe Verduyn, Peter Kuppens

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

44 Citations (Web of Science)


Research has shown that cognitive control processes play a central role in emotion regulation. While most research has examined whether individual differences in such processes are related to the use of these strategies, a crucial next step involves examining whether such differences influence their impact on people's feelings, especially in normal daily life. The present study examined whether impairments in cognitive control (measured using an affective interference resolution task) moderate the impact of using rumination and reappraisal on affective experiences in everyday life (assessed using experience sampling methods). Multilevel analyses revealed that difficulties removing previously relevant negative information from working memory were associated with a larger increase in negative affect following rumination, and smaller increase and decrease in positive and negative affect, respectively, following reappraisal. These findings show that impaired interference resolution for negative information aggravates the deleterious effects of rumination and curbs the benefits of reappraisal in daily life.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)492-501
Number of pages10
JournalCognition & Emotion
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2013
Externally publishedYes


  • Emotion regulation
  • Interference resolution
  • Rumination
  • Reappraisal

Cite this