TY - JOUR
T1 - Insights into Large Carnivore Populations in Uganda: A Participatory Survey of Lions, Leopards, and Hyenas Using Spatial Capture-Recapture
AU - Braczkowski, Alexander R.
AU - Elliot, Nicholas
AU - Rwetsiba, Aggrey
AU - Mudumba, Tutilo
AU - Gopalaswamy, Arjun M.
AU - O'Bryan, Christopher
AU - Crysell, Anna
AU - Biggs, Duan
AU - McCallum, Hamish
AU - Cima, Michael
AU - Musobozi, Silvan
AU - Namukose, Lilian
AU - Jingo, Sophia
AU - Luhonda, Peter
AU - Schenk, Ralph
AU - Okello, Patrick
AU - Komakech, Innocent
AU - Kisembo, Jimmy
AU - Pereira, Keren S.
AU - Drileyo, Gilbert
AU - Cornille, Orin
AU - Atukwatse, Bosco
AU - Engelmann, Anna
AU - Kigongo, Herbert
AU - Kiboneka, Philipp
AU - James, Kevin
AU - Moman, Praveen
AU - Omwesigye, Jonath
AU - Debref, Kris
AU - Tiromwe, Daniel
AU - Nsubuga, Mustafa
AU - Ling, Silvano
AU - Astaras, Christos
AU - Loware, Samuel
AU - Sande, Eric
AU - Kityo, Robert
AU - Siefert, Ludwig
AU - Samarasinghe, Dinal
AU - Langley, Ade
AU - Nuwaijuka, Nicholas
AU - Muzanganda, Nasulu
AU - Asimwe, Brenda
AU - Hore, Saswata
AU - Lindsey, Peter
AU - Gumisiriza, David
AU - Ojok, Richard
AU - Kakaire, Fred
AU - Namugenyi, Denise
AU - Kalyewa, James
AU - Gibson, Luke
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Monitoring wildlife populations at scale is fraught with logistical and resource constraints. Despite this, estimating wildlife population state variables and vital rates remains crucial for science, and to assess conservation investment and effort. The veracity and transparency of results also helps prevent politicization of wildlife populations. In Uganda, robust estimates of carnivore population size are rare in the literature. To overcome a near two-decade long data gap we initiated a survey of African lions, leopards, and spotted hyenas with the Uganda Wildlife Authority across six important protected areas. Surveys were conducted within a spatial capture-recapture framework, the industry gold-standard for monitoring carnivore populations. For lions, we used unstructured spatial sampling protocols (in the form of vehicle-based searches), while for leopards, and spotted hyenas we deployed camera traps. Our protocols were designed to obtain unambiguous individual identification photographs. This large-scale effort involved data collection by >100 local conservation stakeholders (including lodge guides, trophy hunters, university students, and government rangers). Locally extinct in three areas, we show lion numbers are precariously low in two of three sites where they still occur (Queen Elizabeth abundance=39.72, Posterior standard deviation (PSD)=7.96; Kidepo Valley abundance=22.23, PSD=11.67). Murchison Falls was identified as Uganda’s lion stronghold with an estimate of ~240 individuals (PSD=34) and average park-wide densities of 7.43 individuals/100 km2 (PSD=1.05). Leopard densities were highest in Lake Mburo and Murchison Falls. In Murchison they reach some of the highest densities in Africa (14.06 individuals/100 km2, PSD=2.65). Spotted hyena densities were high compared to lions (range=6.15-45.31 individuals/100 km2), except in Lake Mburo where densities were markedly lower (park abundance=23 individuals in 370 km2, PSD=5.26). Our work has critical policy implications, and forms the foundation of the new Strategic Action Plan for Large Carnivore Conservation in Uganda (2023-2033). It also illustrates how cutting-edge, transparent and collaborative science, implemented by multiple wildlife conservation stakeholders can help gauge the conservation status of their wildlife resources.
AB - Monitoring wildlife populations at scale is fraught with logistical and resource constraints. Despite this, estimating wildlife population state variables and vital rates remains crucial for science, and to assess conservation investment and effort. The veracity and transparency of results also helps prevent politicization of wildlife populations. In Uganda, robust estimates of carnivore population size are rare in the literature. To overcome a near two-decade long data gap we initiated a survey of African lions, leopards, and spotted hyenas with the Uganda Wildlife Authority across six important protected areas. Surveys were conducted within a spatial capture-recapture framework, the industry gold-standard for monitoring carnivore populations. For lions, we used unstructured spatial sampling protocols (in the form of vehicle-based searches), while for leopards, and spotted hyenas we deployed camera traps. Our protocols were designed to obtain unambiguous individual identification photographs. This large-scale effort involved data collection by >100 local conservation stakeholders (including lodge guides, trophy hunters, university students, and government rangers). Locally extinct in three areas, we show lion numbers are precariously low in two of three sites where they still occur (Queen Elizabeth abundance=39.72, Posterior standard deviation (PSD)=7.96; Kidepo Valley abundance=22.23, PSD=11.67). Murchison Falls was identified as Uganda’s lion stronghold with an estimate of ~240 individuals (PSD=34) and average park-wide densities of 7.43 individuals/100 km2 (PSD=1.05). Leopard densities were highest in Lake Mburo and Murchison Falls. In Murchison they reach some of the highest densities in Africa (14.06 individuals/100 km2, PSD=2.65). Spotted hyena densities were high compared to lions (range=6.15-45.31 individuals/100 km2), except in Lake Mburo where densities were markedly lower (park abundance=23 individuals in 370 km2, PSD=5.26). Our work has critical policy implications, and forms the foundation of the new Strategic Action Plan for Large Carnivore Conservation in Uganda (2023-2033). It also illustrates how cutting-edge, transparent and collaborative science, implemented by multiple wildlife conservation stakeholders can help gauge the conservation status of their wildlife resources.
KW - Collaboration
KW - population monitoring
KW - wildlife abundance
KW - African lion
KW - spotted hyena
KW - African leopard
KW - density estimation
KW - spatially explicit capture recapture
KW - carnivore
KW - Panthera leo
KW - Panthera pardus
KW - Crocuta crocuta
U2 - 10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03312
DO - 10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03312
M3 - Article
SN - 2351-9894
VL - 56
JO - Global Ecology and Conservation
JF - Global Ecology and Conservation
M1 - e03312
ER -