Abstract
The Triple Helix (3H) model has attracted considerable attention in both developed and emerging economies as a tool to enhance innovation for economic development (Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff, 2000). This article examines the assumption underlying the triple helix that the exchange of diverse knowledge between academia, industry, and government stimulates innovativeness. The research underlying this article investigates whether and how learning is facilitated by triple helix based on a case study of three partnerships established by the Bright Future in Agriculture project in Ethiopia. Data was gathered from 57 respondents through in-depth interviews and surveys. The findings show that participant's learning has taken place due to a more diverse and relevant network, but that 3H partnerships are not by default catalysts for innovation. The authors argue that this would need purposeful orchestration. This study further supports the plea in literature for quadruple or even quintuple helix models, being more apt as inclusive networks for learning and innovation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 219-244 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Triple Helix |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2025 |
Keywords
- Ethiopia
- Multi-stakeholder partnership
- NETWORKS
- Networking
- Social learning
- Triple Helix
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Innovative Capacity in Triple Helix Partnerships: an Assessment of Conditions for Social Learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver