Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Initiatives to increase childhood vaccination coverage: an international comparison

  • Madelon Kroneman*
  • , Alfons Fermin
  • , Bernd Rechel
  • , Sara Allin
  • , Anders Anell
  • , Daiga Behmanee
  • , Theresa Bengoughf
  • , Miriam Bluemelg
  • , Lucie Bryndova
  • , Krisztina Davidovicsi
  • , Antonio Giulio De Belvisj
  • , Chrystala Charalambousk
  • , Charalambos Economou
  • , Shaza Fadel
  • , Ines Fronteira
  • , Peter Gaali
  • , Michel Grignon
  • , Iwona Kowalska-Bobko
  • , Iva Lukacevic Lovrencic
  • , Sarah Mantwill
  • Liubove Murauskiene, Marge Reinap, Maria Rohova, Ingrid Sperre Saunes, Mamas Theodorou, Ruth Waitzberg, Judith D. de Jong
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background Childhood vaccination rates fluctuate over time and do not always meet the levels recommended by the WHO. Objective This study aims to provide an overview of measures countries have introduced to increase vaccination rates. Methods We developed a structured data collection template that was completed by country experts from Europe, Israel, the USA, and Canada. Experts were identified using the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies' HSPM (Health Systems and Policy Monitor) network. We approached experts from 32 countries and received responses from 22 countries. In the template we asked for measures introduced between 2014 and 2019. The experts were asked to indicate the type of intervention, the target population, possible positive and negative effects, and evidence on effectiveness. The information was collected between September 2019 and January 2020. Results We identified four main types of interventions: restrictive measures for the unvaccinated, financial incentives, measures supporting the logistics of vaccination, and vaccination promotion campaigns. Restrictive measures often involved expanding existing mandatory vaccination policies or limiting access to preschool activities for unvaccinated children. Financial incentives for healthcare providers showed some positive effects. Regarding logistical support, several countries used schools as alternative vaccination sites, though this presented organisational challenges. Many countries invested in improving knowledge among both healthcare professionals and parents to encourage vaccine uptake. Conclusions Most initiatives implemented in the countries covered focussed on communication and knowledge enhancement. However, there is limited evidence on the impact of these measures on vaccination coverage.
Original languageEnglish
Article number105351
Number of pages8
JournalHealth Policy
Volume158
Early online date19 May 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2025

Keywords

  • PAPILLOMAVIRUS HPV VACCINE
  • MISSISSIPPI
  • STRATEGIES
  • KNOWLEDGE
  • PARENTS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Initiatives to increase childhood vaccination coverage: an international comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this