Abstract
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | University Evolution, Entrepreneurial Activity and Regional Competitiveness |
Publisher | Springer |
Pages | 207-234 |
Number of pages | 28 |
Volume | 32 |
ISBN (Print) | 9783319177137, 9783319177120 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 |
JEL classifications
- o30 - "Technological Change; Research and Development; Intellectual Property Rights: General"
- i23 - Higher Education and Research Institutions
- r11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes
Keywords
- Academic entrepreneurship
- Regional innovation system
- Regional technology demand
- Technology transfer
Access to Document
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
University Evolution, Entrepreneurial Activity and Regional Competitiveness. Vol. 32 Springer, 2016. p. 207-234.
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Academic
TY - CHAP
T1 - Influences of the regional and national economic environment on the technology transfer performance of academic institutions in Europe
T2 - University Evolution, Entrepreneurial Activity and Regional Competitiveness
AU - Barjak, F.
AU - Es-Sadki, N.
N1 - Export Date: 25 May 2016 Correspondence Address: Barjak, F.; School of Business, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland (FHNW), Riggenbachstrasse 16, Switzerland; email: franz.barjak@fhnw.ch References: Algieri, B., Aquino, A., Succurro, M., Technology transfer offices and academic spin-off creation: the case of Italy (2013) J Technol Transf, 38 (4), pp. 382-400; Arundel, A., Bordoy, C., (2009) Final results for the ASTP survey for Fiscal year 2008, UNU-MERIT report to the ASTP, , UNU-MERIT, Maastricht; Arundel, A., Es-Sadki, N., Barjak, F., Perrett, P., Samuel, O., Lilischkis, S., (2013) Knowledge transfer study 2010-2012, , http://www.ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/knowledge_transfer_2010-2012_report.pdf, Final report to the European Commission, DG Research & Innovation; Arvanitis, S., Ley, M.C., Seliger, F., Stucki, T., Wörter, M., (2013) Innovationsaktivitäten in der Schweizer Wirtschaft-Eine Analyse der Ergebnisse der Innovationserhebung 2011, 39. , Zürich; Barjak, F., Es-Sadki, N., Arundel, A., The effectiveness of policies for formal knowledge transfer from European universities and public research institutes to firms (2015) Res Eval, 24, pp. 4-18; Belenzon, S., Schankerman, M., University knowledge transfer: private ownership, incentives, and local development objectives (2009) J Law Econ, 52, pp. 111-144; Breznitz, S.M., O'Shea, R.P., Allen, T.J., University commercialization strategies in the development of regional bioclusters (2008) J Prod Innov Manag, 25 (2), pp. 129-142; Chapple, W., Lockett, A., Siegel, D., Wright, M., Assessing the relative performance of U.K university technology transfer offices: parametric and non-parametric evidence. (2005) Res Policy, 34 (3), pp. 369-384; Conti, A., Gaule, P., Is the US outperforming Europe in university technology licensing? A new perspective on the European paradox (2011) Res Policy, 40 (1), pp. 123-135; Di Gregorio, D., Shane, S., Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? (2003) Res Policy, 32 (2), pp. 209-227; Dornbusch, F., Kroll, H., Schricke, E., (2012) Multiple dimensions of regionally-oriented university involvement: how motivation and opportunity prompt German researchers to engage in different ways, , Working papers firms and region, No. R6/2012, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI, Karlsruhe; Drucker, J., Goldstein, H., Assessing the regional economic development impacts of universities:a review of current approaches (2007) Int Reg Sci Rev, 30 (1), pp. 20-46; (2013) Eurostat regional yearbook 2013, , http://www.epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-HA-09-001/EN/KS-HA-09-001-EN.PDF; Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., Santoni, S., Sobrero, M., Complements or substitutes? The role of universities and local context in supporting the creation of academic spin-offs (2011) Res Policy, 40 (8), pp. 1113-1127; Friedman, J., Silberman, J., University technology transfer: do incentives, management, and location matter? (2003) J Technol Transf, 28 (1), pp. 17-30; Fromhold-Eisebith, M., Werker, C., Universities' functions in knowledge transfer: a geographical perspective (2013) Ann Reg Sci, 51 (3), pp. 621-643; Geuna, A., Rossi, F., Changes to university IPR regulations in Europe and the impact on academic patenting (2011) Res Policy, 40 (8), pp. 1068-1076; González-Pernía, J.L., Kuechle, G., Peña-Legazkue, I., An assessment of the determinants of university technology transfer (2013) Econ Dev Q, 27 (1), pp. 6-17; Hülsbeck, M., Lehmann, E.E., Starnecker, A., Performance of technology transfer offices in Germany (2013) J Technol Transf, 38 (3), pp. 199-215; Jacobsson, S., Å, L.-D., Elg, L., Is the commercialization of European academic R&D weak? A critical assessment of a dominant belief and associated policy responses (2013) Res Policy, 42 (4), pp. 874-885; Lach, S., Schankerman, M., Incentives and invention in universities (2008) RAND J Econ, 39 (2), pp. 403-433; Link, A.N., Siegel, D.S., Generating science-based growth: an econometric analysis of the impact of organizational incentives on university-industry technology transfer (2005) Eur J Finance, 11 (3), pp. 169-181; Lissoni, F., Llerena, P., McKelvey, M., Sanditov, B., Academic patenting in Europe: new evidence from the KEINS database (2008) Res Eval, 17, pp. 87-102; O'Shea, R.P., Allen, T.J., Chevalier, A., Roche, F., Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S universities. (2005) Res Policy, 34 (7), pp. 994-1009; Power, D., Malmberg, A., The contribution of universities to innovation and economic development: in what sense a regional problem? (2008) Camb J Reg Econ Soc, 1 (2), pp. 233-245; Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D., Link, A., Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study (2003) Res Policy, 32 (1), pp. 27-48; Sine, W.D., Shane, S., Di Gregorio, D., The Halo Effect and technology licensing: the influence of institutional prestige on the licensing of university inventions (2003) Manag Sci, 49 (4), pp. 478-496; Uyarra, E., Conceptualizing the regional roles of universities, implications and contradictions (2010) Eur Plan Stud, 18 (8), pp. 1227-1246; Valentin, F., Jensen, R., Effects on academia-industry collaboration of extending university property rights (2007) J Technol Transf, 32 (3), pp. 251-276; Van Looy, B., Landoni, P., Callaert, J., van Pottelsberghe, B., Sapsalis, E., Debackere, K., Entrepreneurial effectiveness of European universities: an empirical assessment of antecedents and trade-offs (2011) Res Policy, 40 (4), pp. 553-564; Warren, A., Hanke, R., Trotzer, D., Models for university technology transfer: resolving conflicts between mission and methods and the dependency on geographic location (2008) Camb J Reg Econ Soc, 1 (2), pp. 219-232; Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Lockett, A., Knockaert, M., Mid-range universities' linkages with industry: knowledge types and the role of intermediaries (2008) Res Policy, 37 (8), pp. 1205-1223
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - The paper looks how the national and regional environment influence the knowledge and technology transfer (KTT) performance of universities and public research institutes. We regress a number of institutional control variables, country dummies and variables for region size and economic structure, per capita income, technology intensity, and R&D intensity on four different tech transfer performance measures (R&D agreements with companies, patent applications, start-ups, licence agreements). Drawing on data from a survey of more than 200 European institutions we find: (1) Country differences are related to differences in the institutional set-up of technology transfer and to the (regional) economic environment which suggests multi-level analyses to properly take these interactions into account. (2) Institutions in a country usually excel for one performance measure which we take as a supporting argument for the development of transfer strategies. (3) Having manufacturing companies and a large share of governmental R&D expenditure in the region matter more than the technology intensity and R&D intensity of the regional economy. The latter result is counterintuitive and indicates that further research is needed in order to understand better where the clients of university technologies actually come from. © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016. All rights are reserved.
AB - The paper looks how the national and regional environment influence the knowledge and technology transfer (KTT) performance of universities and public research institutes. We regress a number of institutional control variables, country dummies and variables for region size and economic structure, per capita income, technology intensity, and R&D intensity on four different tech transfer performance measures (R&D agreements with companies, patent applications, start-ups, licence agreements). Drawing on data from a survey of more than 200 European institutions we find: (1) Country differences are related to differences in the institutional set-up of technology transfer and to the (regional) economic environment which suggests multi-level analyses to properly take these interactions into account. (2) Institutions in a country usually excel for one performance measure which we take as a supporting argument for the development of transfer strategies. (3) Having manufacturing companies and a large share of governmental R&D expenditure in the region matter more than the technology intensity and R&D intensity of the regional economy. The latter result is counterintuitive and indicates that further research is needed in order to understand better where the clients of university technologies actually come from. © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016. All rights are reserved.
KW - Academic entrepreneurship
KW - Regional innovation system
KW - Regional technology demand
KW - Technology transfer
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-17713-7_10
DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-17713-7_10
M3 - Chapter
SN - 9783319177137
SN - 9783319177120
VL - 32
SP - 207
EP - 234
BT - University Evolution, Entrepreneurial Activity and Regional Competitiveness
PB - Springer
ER -