Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Inference-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy versus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Multisite Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial

  • Nadja Wolf*
  • , Patricia van Oppen
  • , Adriaan W Hoogendoorn
  • , Odile A van den Heuvel
  • , Harold J G M van Megen
  • , Aniek Broekhuizen
  • , Mirjam Kampman
  • , Daniëlle C Cath
  • , Koen R J Schruers
  • , Saskia M van Es
  • , Tamara Opdam
  • , Anton J L M van Balkom
  • , Henny A D Visser
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) effectively treats obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), many patients refuse CBT or drop out prematurely, partly because of anxiety regarding exposure and response prevention (ERP) exercises. Inference-based cognitive behavioral therapy (I-CBT) focuses on correcting distorted inferential thinking patterns, enhancing reality-based reasoning, and addressing obsessional doubt by targeting underlying dysfunctional reasoning, without incorporating an ERP component. We hypothesized that I-CBT would be non-inferior to CBT. Additionally, we hypothesized that I-CBT would be more tolerable than CBT. METHODS: 197 participants were randomly assigned to 20 sessions CBT or I-CBT and assessed at baseline, posttreatment, and 6 and 12 months' follow-up. The primary outcome was OCD symptom severity measured using the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS; non-inferiority margin: 2 points). The secondary outcome, treatment tolerability, was assessed using the Treatment Acceptability/Adherence Scale (TAAS). A linear mixed-effects model was used to assess the non-inferiority of the primary outcome and superiority of secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Statistically significant within-group improvements in the primary and secondary outcomes were observed in both treatments. No statistically significant between-group differences in Y-BOCS were found at any assessment point, but the confidence intervals exceeded the non-inferiority threshold, making the results inconclusive. The estimated mean posttreatment TAAS score was significantly higher in the I-CBT group than in the CBT group. CONCLUSION: While both CBT and I-CBT are effective for OCD, whether I-CBT is non-inferior to CBT in terms of OCD symptom severity remains inconclusive. Nevertheless, I-CBT offers better tolerability and warrants consideration as an alternative treatment for OCD.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)397-411
Number of pages15
JournalPsychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Volume93
Issue number6
Early online date18 Oct 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2024

Keywords

  • Cognitive behavioral therapy
  • Inference-based cognitive behavioral therapy
  • Obsessive-compulsive disorder
  • Psychiatric disorders
  • Treatment outcome

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Inference-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy versus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Multisite Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this