Individual differences and false confessions: A conceptual replication of Kassin and Kiechel (1996)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

79 Citations (Scopus)
1654 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In their study, Kassin and Kiechel (1996) falsely accused students of causing a computer crash and found that 69% of them were willing to sign a false confession, 28% internalized guilt, and 9% confabulated details to support their false beliefs. The authors interpreted these results to mean that false confessions can be easily elicited. However, in their study, false confessions were explicitly not associated with negative consequences. The current study examined whether false incriminating evidence may elicit false confessions in undergraduate students when such confessions are explicitly associated with financial loss. We also explored whether individual differences in compliance, suggestibility, fantasy-proneness, dissociation, and cognitive failures are related to false confessions. The large majority of participants (82%) were willing to sign a false confession. In about half of the participants, false confessions were accompanied by internalization and confabulation. There was no evidence that individual differences modulate participants' susceptibility to false confessions. Taken together, our study replicates previous findings of Kassin and Kiechel.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-8
JournalPsychology Crime & Law
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2003

Cite this

@article{881f6316d7df49a0b737b99f123852f6,
title = "Individual differences and false confessions: A conceptual replication of Kassin and Kiechel (1996)",
abstract = "In their study, Kassin and Kiechel (1996) falsely accused students of causing a computer crash and found that 69{\%} of them were willing to sign a false confession, 28{\%} internalized guilt, and 9{\%} confabulated details to support their false beliefs. The authors interpreted these results to mean that false confessions can be easily elicited. However, in their study, false confessions were explicitly not associated with negative consequences. The current study examined whether false incriminating evidence may elicit false confessions in undergraduate students when such confessions are explicitly associated with financial loss. We also explored whether individual differences in compliance, suggestibility, fantasy-proneness, dissociation, and cognitive failures are related to false confessions. The large majority of participants (82{\%}) were willing to sign a false confession. In about half of the participants, false confessions were accompanied by internalization and confabulation. There was no evidence that individual differences modulate participants' susceptibility to false confessions. Taken together, our study replicates previous findings of Kassin and Kiechel.",
author = "R. Horselenberg and H.L.G.J. Merckelbach and S. Josephs",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10683160308141",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "Psychology Crime & Law",
issn = "1068-316X",
publisher = "Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group",
number = "1",

}

Individual differences and false confessions: A conceptual replication of Kassin and Kiechel (1996). / Horselenberg, R.; Merckelbach, H.L.G.J.; Josephs, S.

In: Psychology Crime & Law, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.01.2003, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual differences and false confessions: A conceptual replication of Kassin and Kiechel (1996)

AU - Horselenberg, R.

AU - Merckelbach, H.L.G.J.

AU - Josephs, S.

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - In their study, Kassin and Kiechel (1996) falsely accused students of causing a computer crash and found that 69% of them were willing to sign a false confession, 28% internalized guilt, and 9% confabulated details to support their false beliefs. The authors interpreted these results to mean that false confessions can be easily elicited. However, in their study, false confessions were explicitly not associated with negative consequences. The current study examined whether false incriminating evidence may elicit false confessions in undergraduate students when such confessions are explicitly associated with financial loss. We also explored whether individual differences in compliance, suggestibility, fantasy-proneness, dissociation, and cognitive failures are related to false confessions. The large majority of participants (82%) were willing to sign a false confession. In about half of the participants, false confessions were accompanied by internalization and confabulation. There was no evidence that individual differences modulate participants' susceptibility to false confessions. Taken together, our study replicates previous findings of Kassin and Kiechel.

AB - In their study, Kassin and Kiechel (1996) falsely accused students of causing a computer crash and found that 69% of them were willing to sign a false confession, 28% internalized guilt, and 9% confabulated details to support their false beliefs. The authors interpreted these results to mean that false confessions can be easily elicited. However, in their study, false confessions were explicitly not associated with negative consequences. The current study examined whether false incriminating evidence may elicit false confessions in undergraduate students when such confessions are explicitly associated with financial loss. We also explored whether individual differences in compliance, suggestibility, fantasy-proneness, dissociation, and cognitive failures are related to false confessions. The large majority of participants (82%) were willing to sign a false confession. In about half of the participants, false confessions were accompanied by internalization and confabulation. There was no evidence that individual differences modulate participants' susceptibility to false confessions. Taken together, our study replicates previous findings of Kassin and Kiechel.

U2 - 10.1080/10683160308141

DO - 10.1080/10683160308141

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - Psychology Crime & Law

JF - Psychology Crime & Law

SN - 1068-316X

IS - 1

ER -