Indications for Mandibular Setback/Advancement Using IVRO or Inverted L Osteotomy

Kensuke Yamauchi; Peter Kessler

doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06978-9_33

Indications for Mandibular Setback/Advancement Using IVRO or Inverted L Osteotomy

Kensuke Yamauchi, Peter Kessler^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › Academic

Abstract

Vertical splitting of the ascending mandibular branch is an old procedure. This technique is suitable when the mandible is to be repositioned, especially in class III correction, mandibular prognathism. This technique is no longer recommended for mandibular advancement. In regions with predominantly prognathic jaw types, this technique is popular because it can be performed quickly and is gentle on the tissue. Advantages of the BSSO, such as sufficient bone overlay, are eliminated. The stability of osteosynthetic stabilization cannot be compared with the possibilities of the BSSO. Even in the case of strong horizontal rotational movement, a vertical ramus osteotomy can be applied on the side facing the rotation.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Illustrated Manual of Orthognathic Surgery
Subtitle of host publication	Osteotomies of the Mandible
Editors	Peter Kessler , Nicolas Hardt , Kensuke Yamauchi
Publisher	Springer
Pages	275-276
Number of pages	2
ISBN (Electronic)	9783031069789
ISBN (Print)	9783031069772
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06978-9_33
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 2024

Keywords

Bird-face deformity
Class III
Mandibular setback
Mandibular setback– IVRO–BSSO–inverted L osteotomy
Modifications and surgical alternatives
Orthognathic
Special surgical aspects in mandibular setback
Vertical osteotomy and mandibular setback

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-031-06978-9_33

Cite this

@inbook{4446c73ac58740319c57711514532711,

title = "Indications for Mandibular Setback/Advancement Using IVRO or Inverted L Osteotomy",

abstract = "Vertical splitting of the ascending mandibular branch is an old procedure. This technique is suitable when the mandible is to be repositioned, especially in class III correction, mandibular prognathism. This technique is no longer recommended for mandibular advancement. In regions with predominantly prognathic jaw types, this technique is popular because it can be performed quickly and is gentle on the tissue. Advantages of the BSSO, such as sufficient bone overlay, are eliminated. The stability of osteosynthetic stabilization cannot be compared with the possibilities of the BSSO. Even in the case of strong horizontal rotational movement, a vertical ramus osteotomy can be applied on the side facing the rotation.",

keywords = "Bird-face deformity, Class III, Mandibular setback, Mandibular setback– IVRO–BSSO–inverted L osteotomy, Modifications and surgical alternatives, Orthognathic, Special surgical aspects in mandibular setback, Vertical osteotomy and mandibular setback",

author = "Kensuke Yamauchi and Peter Kessler",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024.",

year = "2024",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-031-06978-9_33",

language = "English",

isbn = "9783031069772",

pages = "275--276",

editor = "{Peter Kessler} and {Nicolas Hardt} and {Kensuke Yamauchi}",

booktitle = "Illustrated Manual of Orthognathic Surgery",

publisher = "Springer",

address = "United States",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Indications for Mandibular Setback/Advancement Using IVRO or Inverted L Osteotomy

AU - Yamauchi, Kensuke

AU - Kessler, Peter

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024.

PY - 2024/1/1

Y1 - 2024/1/1

N2 - Vertical splitting of the ascending mandibular branch is an old procedure. This technique is suitable when the mandible is to be repositioned, especially in class III correction, mandibular prognathism. This technique is no longer recommended for mandibular advancement. In regions with predominantly prognathic jaw types, this technique is popular because it can be performed quickly and is gentle on the tissue. Advantages of the BSSO, such as sufficient bone overlay, are eliminated. The stability of osteosynthetic stabilization cannot be compared with the possibilities of the BSSO. Even in the case of strong horizontal rotational movement, a vertical ramus osteotomy can be applied on the side facing the rotation.

AB - Vertical splitting of the ascending mandibular branch is an old procedure. This technique is suitable when the mandible is to be repositioned, especially in class III correction, mandibular prognathism. This technique is no longer recommended for mandibular advancement. In regions with predominantly prognathic jaw types, this technique is popular because it can be performed quickly and is gentle on the tissue. Advantages of the BSSO, such as sufficient bone overlay, are eliminated. The stability of osteosynthetic stabilization cannot be compared with the possibilities of the BSSO. Even in the case of strong horizontal rotational movement, a vertical ramus osteotomy can be applied on the side facing the rotation.

KW - Bird-face deformity

KW - Class III

KW - Mandibular setback

KW - Mandibular setback– IVRO–BSSO–inverted L osteotomy

KW - Modifications and surgical alternatives

KW - Orthognathic

KW - Special surgical aspects in mandibular setback

KW - Vertical osteotomy and mandibular setback

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-031-06978-9_33

DO - 10.1007/978-3-031-06978-9_33

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783031069772

SP - 275

EP - 276

BT - Illustrated Manual of Orthognathic Surgery

A2 - , Peter Kessler

A2 - , Nicolas Hardt

A2 - , Kensuke Yamauchi

PB - Springer

ER -

Indications for Mandibular Setback/Advancement Using IVRO or Inverted L Osteotomy

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this