In Defense of the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity: Response to Radder

J. de Ridder*, L. Bouter, T. Haven, R. Peels, J. Tijdink, M.P. Zeegers

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We assess Radder's criticisms of the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity and show that they either miss their mark or depend on controversial background assumptions about the purpose of the Code. Although Radder raises important questions about the broader roles and purposes of research in society, his conclusion that the Code should be revised in the ways he proposes is unjustified.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)276-283
Number of pages8
JournalAccountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance
Volume30
Issue number5
Early online date1 Feb 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Jul 2023

Keywords

  • Research Integrity
  • Netherlands code of conduct for research integrity
  • Responsible research and innovation
  • Mertonian norms
  • patenting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In Defense of the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity: Response to Radder'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this