TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving primary care for diabetes and hypertension
T2 - findings from implementation research in rural South India
AU - Lall, Dorothy
AU - Engel, Nora
AU - Srinivasan, Prashanth N.
AU - Devadasan, Narayanan
AU - Horstman, Klasien
AU - Criel, Bart
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding The primary author and the research was supported by a PhD scholarship from the Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium. PNS time contributions were supported by a DBT/Wellcome Trust India Alliance fellowship (number IA/ CPHI/16/1/502648) awarded to him.
Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Background Chronic conditions are a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Low-income and middle-income countries such as India bear a significant proportion of this global burden. Redesigning primary care from an acute-care model to a model that facilitates chronic care is a challenge and requires interventions at multiple levels. Objectives In this intervention study, we aimed to strengthen primary care for diabetes and hypertension at publicly funded primary healthcare centres (PHCs) in rural South India. Design and methods The complexities of transforming the delivery of primary care motivated us to use a 'theory of change' approach to design, implement and evaluate the interventions. We used both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods. Data from patient records regarding processes of care, glycaemic and blood pressure control, interviews with patients, observations and field notes were used to analyse what changes occurred and why. Interventions We implemented the interventions for 9 months at three PHCs: (1) rationalise workflow to include essential tasks like counselling and measurement of blood pressure/blood glucose at each visit; (2) distribute clinical tasks among staff; (3) retain clinical records at the health facility and (4) capacity building of staff. Results We found that interventions were implemented at all three PHCs for the first 4 months but did not continue at two of the PHCs. This fadeout was most likely the result of staff transfers and a doctor's reluctance to share tasks. The availability of an additional staff member in the role of a coordinator most likely influenced the relative success of implementation at one PHC. Conclusion These findings draw attention to the need for building teams in primary care for managing chronic conditions. The role of a coordinator emerged as an important consideration, as did the need for a stable core of staff to provide continuity of care.
AB - Background Chronic conditions are a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Low-income and middle-income countries such as India bear a significant proportion of this global burden. Redesigning primary care from an acute-care model to a model that facilitates chronic care is a challenge and requires interventions at multiple levels. Objectives In this intervention study, we aimed to strengthen primary care for diabetes and hypertension at publicly funded primary healthcare centres (PHCs) in rural South India. Design and methods The complexities of transforming the delivery of primary care motivated us to use a 'theory of change' approach to design, implement and evaluate the interventions. We used both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods. Data from patient records regarding processes of care, glycaemic and blood pressure control, interviews with patients, observations and field notes were used to analyse what changes occurred and why. Interventions We implemented the interventions for 9 months at three PHCs: (1) rationalise workflow to include essential tasks like counselling and measurement of blood pressure/blood glucose at each visit; (2) distribute clinical tasks among staff; (3) retain clinical records at the health facility and (4) capacity building of staff. Results We found that interventions were implemented at all three PHCs for the first 4 months but did not continue at two of the PHCs. This fadeout was most likely the result of staff transfers and a doctor's reluctance to share tasks. The availability of an additional staff member in the role of a coordinator most likely influenced the relative success of implementation at one PHC. Conclusion These findings draw attention to the need for building teams in primary care for managing chronic conditions. The role of a coordinator emerged as an important consideration, as did the need for a stable core of staff to provide continuity of care.
KW - primary care
KW - organisation of health services
KW - quality in health care
KW - general diabetes
KW - MODEL
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040271
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040271
M3 - Article
C2 - 33323433
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 10
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 12
M1 - 040271
ER -