Improving decision making in larynx cancer by developing a decision aid: A mixed methods approach

Japke F. Petersen*, Adriana Berlanga, Martijn M. Stuiver, Olga Hamming-Vrieze, Frank Hoebers, Philippe Lambin, Michiel W. M. van den Brekel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

11 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

Objective Patients diagnosed with advanced larynx cancer face a decisional process in which they can choose between radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, or a total laryngectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy. Clinicians do not always agree on the best clinical treatment, making the decisional process for patients a complex problem. Methods Guided by the International Patient Decision Aid (PDA) Standards, we followed three developmental phases for which we held semi-structured in-depth interviews with patients and physicians, thinking-out-loud sessions, and a study-specific questionnaire. Audio-recorded interviews were verbatim transcribed, thematically coded, and analyzed. Phase 1 consisted of an evaluation of the decisional needs and the regular counseling process; phase 2 tested the comprehensibility and usability of the PDA; and phase 3 beta tested the feasibility of the PDA. Results Patients and doctors agreed on the need for development of a PDA. Major revisions were conducted after phase 1 to improve the readability and replace the majority of text with video animations. Patients and physicians considered the PDA to be a major improvement to the current counseling process. Conclusion This study describes the development of a comprehensible and easy-to-use online patient decision aid for advanced larynx cancer, which was found satisfactory by patients and physicians (available on ). The outcome of the interviews underscores the need for better patient counseling. The feasibility and satisfaction among newly diagnosed patients as well as doctors will need to be proven. To this end, we started a multicenter trial evaluating the PDA in clinical practice ( Identifier: NCT03292341). Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope, 129:2733-2739, 2019

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2733-2739
Number of pages7
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume129
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2019

Keywords

  • Patient decision aid
  • counseling
  • health communication
  • larynx cancer
  • chemoradiotherapy
  • radiotherapy
  • laryngectomy
  • PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES
  • TOTAL LARYNGECTOMY
  • NECK-CANCER
  • SURVIVAL
  • PRESERVATION
  • QUALITY
  • INFORMATION
  • VALIDATION
  • RADIATION
  • TRENDS

Cite this