@article{7b2a7de4fd7a41398137c121d4cb679f,
title = "Implementation research for taking tobacco control policies to scale in India: a realist evaluation study protocol",
abstract = "Introduction There are ongoing policies and programs to reduce tobacco use and minimise the associated health burden in India. However, there are several challenges in practice leading to different outcomes across Indian states. Inadequate understanding of how national tobacco control policies achieve their results under varied circumstances obstruct the implementation and scaling up of effective strategies. This study is a realist evaluation using largely qualitative methods to understand the implementation process of India's tobacco control policies. It will do so by evaluating India's Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA) and the National Tobacco Control Program (NTCP). The study aims to examine how, why, for whom and under which circumstances COTPA and NTCP are implemented in India. Methods and analysis A realist synthesis on implementation of tobacco control policies in low-income and middle-income countries is conducted. This is followed by qualitative data collection and analysis in three Indian states selected based on data from two rounds of the Global Adult Tobacco Survey. The study comprises of three steps (1): development of initial programme theories, (2) testing and refinement of initial programme theories and (3) testing and validation of refined programme theories. We will interview policy-makers, programme managers and implementers to identify facilitators and barriers of implementation. The purpose is to identify context-specific evidence-based strategies to gain insights into the implementation process of COTPA and NTCP. Further we aim to contribute to tobacco control research by establishing communities of practice to engage with cross-cutting issues. Ethics and dissemination The Institutional Ethics Committee, at the Institute of Public Health (Bengaluru), has approved the protocol. Written informed consent forms will be obtained from all the participants. Dissemination has been planned for researchers, policy-makers and implementers as well as the public through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentation, webinars and social media updates. PROSPERO registration number CRD42020191541.",
keywords = "health policy, public health, protocols &, guidelines",
author = "P.B. Hebbar and V. Dsouza and U. Bhojani and {van Schayck}, O.C.P. and G.R. Babu and G. Nagelhout",
note = "Funding Information: Funding The study is supported by the Department of Biotechnology/Wellcome Trust India Alliance Early Career Fellowship awarded to Pragati Hebbar [IA/ CPHE/17/1/503338]. Funding Information: The theory-driven inquiry is considered promising in its attempt to evaluate complex phenomena because it examines the causal mechanisms by considering the contexts within which the intervention is embedded that facilitates a particular kind of change.13–15 Realist evaluation, a form of theory-driven inquiry, is increasingly used to assess health policies and programmes, to explain what works for whom and under what circumstances instead of simply {\textquoteleft}does it work or not?{\textquoteright}16 The goal of realist evaluation is to make sense of conditions in which interventions work (or not) by generating plausible mechanisms. In tobacco control policy implementation, some of these potential conditions are geographic, demographic, economic, religious and cultural factors rooted in complex sociopolitical systems that drive or hinder implementation of policies. The study aims to explain how certain facilitators and barriers shape implementation of COTPA and NTCP in India, which can be used to inform policy-makers about best practices. The current research constitutes a doctoral study that is part of a broader enquiry that aims to inform policy and practice through a Department of Biotechnology/Wellcome Trust early career fellowship grant. The broad research question that is addressed in this study is: How were tobacco control policies implemented in India between 2003 and 2018? This is subdivided into three questions that will guide the study. a. Which states performed better (implementation and outcomes), and for whom (which populations) was it better? b. How do Indian states differ with respect to tobacco control outcomes? c. Which factors facilitated successes in implementation in some settings? How were these achievements sus-tained? And what were the barriers? Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.",
year = "2021",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050859",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "5",
}