Implementation of the nutrition and health claim regulation - The case of antioxidants

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article analyses the consequences of the implementation of the nutrition and health claim regulation in the field of food products containing antioxidants or food products claiming antioxidant activity. To this end, it first examines the origin and creation of the regulation and the involvement of EFSA in assessing scientific substantiation of health claims. Three criteria are regarded as critical in EFSA's opinions on the scientific substantiation of a health claim: the claimed effect (i) is well defined; (ii) is a clear beneficial physiological effect; and (iii) shows a cause effect relationship with the consumption of the food or functional ingredient. These criteria have implications for the research requested to substantiate health claims, although these implications do not all seem to fit nutrition research as it is currently executed. Looking at antioxidants, the complexity of the mechanisms and actions of antioxidants is not recognised by the criteria used to evaluate proposed health claims, nor by the methodologies used to assess the effects of antioxidants. These criteria should be adjusted with novel scientific insights after consulting stakeholders.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)475-487
Number of pages13
JournalRegulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
Volume68
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2014

Keywords

  • EFSA
  • European Commission
  • Food law
  • Scientific substantiation
  • Functional ingredients
  • Oxidative stress
  • Antioxidants
  • Nutrition research
  • Multifactorial
  • OXIDATIVE STRESS
  • FOOD
  • NUTRIENTS
  • DISEASE
  • MECHANISMS
  • PATHWAYS
  • SYSTEMS
  • EU

Cite this

@article{7a35ac8b1b5949ca8db7c8e1c3ad72be,
title = "Implementation of the nutrition and health claim regulation - The case of antioxidants",
abstract = "This article analyses the consequences of the implementation of the nutrition and health claim regulation in the field of food products containing antioxidants or food products claiming antioxidant activity. To this end, it first examines the origin and creation of the regulation and the involvement of EFSA in assessing scientific substantiation of health claims. Three criteria are regarded as critical in EFSA's opinions on the scientific substantiation of a health claim: the claimed effect (i) is well defined; (ii) is a clear beneficial physiological effect; and (iii) shows a cause effect relationship with the consumption of the food or functional ingredient. These criteria have implications for the research requested to substantiate health claims, although these implications do not all seem to fit nutrition research as it is currently executed. Looking at antioxidants, the complexity of the mechanisms and actions of antioxidants is not recognised by the criteria used to evaluate proposed health claims, nor by the methodologies used to assess the effects of antioxidants. These criteria should be adjusted with novel scientific insights after consulting stakeholders.",
keywords = "EFSA, European Commission, Food law, Scientific substantiation, Functional ingredients, Oxidative stress, Antioxidants, Nutrition research, Multifactorial, OXIDATIVE STRESS, FOOD, NUTRIENTS, DISEASE, MECHANISMS, PATHWAYS, SYSTEMS, EU",
author = "{de Boer}, A. and E. Vos and A. Bast",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.01.014",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "475--487",
journal = "Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology",
issn = "0273-2300",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",
number = "3",

}

Implementation of the nutrition and health claim regulation - The case of antioxidants. / de Boer, A.; Vos, E.; Bast, A.

In: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Vol. 68, No. 3, 04.2014, p. 475-487.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementation of the nutrition and health claim regulation - The case of antioxidants

AU - de Boer, A.

AU - Vos, E.

AU - Bast, A.

PY - 2014/4

Y1 - 2014/4

N2 - This article analyses the consequences of the implementation of the nutrition and health claim regulation in the field of food products containing antioxidants or food products claiming antioxidant activity. To this end, it first examines the origin and creation of the regulation and the involvement of EFSA in assessing scientific substantiation of health claims. Three criteria are regarded as critical in EFSA's opinions on the scientific substantiation of a health claim: the claimed effect (i) is well defined; (ii) is a clear beneficial physiological effect; and (iii) shows a cause effect relationship with the consumption of the food or functional ingredient. These criteria have implications for the research requested to substantiate health claims, although these implications do not all seem to fit nutrition research as it is currently executed. Looking at antioxidants, the complexity of the mechanisms and actions of antioxidants is not recognised by the criteria used to evaluate proposed health claims, nor by the methodologies used to assess the effects of antioxidants. These criteria should be adjusted with novel scientific insights after consulting stakeholders.

AB - This article analyses the consequences of the implementation of the nutrition and health claim regulation in the field of food products containing antioxidants or food products claiming antioxidant activity. To this end, it first examines the origin and creation of the regulation and the involvement of EFSA in assessing scientific substantiation of health claims. Three criteria are regarded as critical in EFSA's opinions on the scientific substantiation of a health claim: the claimed effect (i) is well defined; (ii) is a clear beneficial physiological effect; and (iii) shows a cause effect relationship with the consumption of the food or functional ingredient. These criteria have implications for the research requested to substantiate health claims, although these implications do not all seem to fit nutrition research as it is currently executed. Looking at antioxidants, the complexity of the mechanisms and actions of antioxidants is not recognised by the criteria used to evaluate proposed health claims, nor by the methodologies used to assess the effects of antioxidants. These criteria should be adjusted with novel scientific insights after consulting stakeholders.

KW - EFSA

KW - European Commission

KW - Food law

KW - Scientific substantiation

KW - Functional ingredients

KW - Oxidative stress

KW - Antioxidants

KW - Nutrition research

KW - Multifactorial

KW - OXIDATIVE STRESS

KW - FOOD

KW - NUTRIENTS

KW - DISEASE

KW - MECHANISMS

KW - PATHWAYS

KW - SYSTEMS

KW - EU

U2 - 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.01.014

DO - 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.01.014

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 475

EP - 487

JO - Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

JF - Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

SN - 0273-2300

IS - 3

ER -