Impact of Self- and Peer Assessment on the Clinical Performance of Physiotherapists in Primary Care: A Cohort Study

Marjo J. M. Maas*, Femke Driehuis, Guus A. Meerhoff, Yvonne F. Heerkens, Cees P. M. van der Vleuten, Maria W. G. Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Philip J. van der Wees

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Web of Science)
13 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the impact of a quality improvement programme based on self- and peer assessment to justify nationwide implementation. Method: Four professional networks of physiotherapists in The Netherlands (n = 379) participated in the programme, which consisted of two cycles of online self-assessment and peer assessment using video recordings of client communication and clinical records. Assessment was based on performance indicators that could be scored on a 5-point Likert scale, and online assessment was followed by face-to-face feedback discussions. After cycle 1, participants developed personal learning goals. These goals were analyzed thematically, and goal attainment was measured using a questionnaire. Improvement in performance was tested with multilevel regression analyses, comparing the self-assessment and peer-assessment scores in cycles 1 and 2. Results: In total, 364 (96%) of the participants were active in online self-assessment and peer assessment. However, online activities varied between cycle 1 and cycle 2 and between client communication and recordkeeping. Personal goals addressed client-centred communication (54%), recordkeeping (24%), performance and outcome measurement (15%), and other (7%). Goals were completely attained (29%), partly attained (64%), or not attained at all (7%). Self-assessment and peer-assessment scores improved significantly for both client communication (self-assessment = 11%; peer assessment = 8%) and recordkeeping (self-assessment = 7%; peer assessment = 4%). Conclusions: Self-assessment and peer assessment are effective in enhancing commitment to change and improving clinical performance. Nationwide implementation of the programme is justified. Future studies should address the impact on client outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)393-401
Number of pages9
JournalPhysiotherapy Canada
Volume70
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2018

Keywords

  • peer review
  • performance appraisal
  • quality improvement
  • self-assessment
  • primary care
  • cohort studies
  • HEALTH-CARE
  • FEEDBACK
  • QUALITY
  • IMPLEMENTATION
  • EDUCATION
  • AUDIT

Cite this