Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Impact of Dupilumab for Severe Asthma on Fatigue, Quality of Life, Work Productivity, and Activity

  • Lianne ten Have*
  • , Karin B. Fieten
  • , Fleur L. Meulmeester
  • , Els J.M. Weersink
  • , Pieter Paul Hekking
  • , Sarah A. van Nederveen-Bendien
  • , Arnoud F. Aldenkamp
  • , Kornelis W. Patberg
  • , Marjo J.T. van de Ven
  • , Ilonka H. van Veen
  • , Astrid van Huisstede
  • , Annelies Beukert
  • , Thomas Macken
  • , Karen T.M. Oud
  • , Lennart Conemans
  • , Edwin van Velzen
  • , Marijke Amelink
  • , Jeroen M.A.M. Retera
  • , Lotte van Ruitenbeek
  • , Gert Jan Braunstahl
  • Simone Hashimoto, Johannes A. Kroes, Jacob K. Sont, Anneke ten Brinke, Kim de Jong
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Severe asthma greatly impacts daily life. Although biologics such as dupilumab improve clinical outcomes, their effects on patient-reported outcome measures prioritized by patients remain largely unexplored. Objective: (1) To evaluate changes in fatigue, quality of life (QoL), and work and activity impairment over 12 months following dupilumab initiation in a large severe asthma cohort. (2) To explore differences between biologic-naive patients and switchers and assess the relationship with asthma symptom control. Methods: Dutch severe asthma registry data were used, measuring fatigue (Checklist for Individual Strength – Subjective Fatigue), QoL (Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire), work and activity impairment (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment – General Health), and asthma symptom control (6-item Asthma Control Questionnaire) at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Changes over time and mean improvement “on dupilumab” (baseline vs 3-12 months) were explored using linear mixed models. Results: Among 236 patients (45% biologic-naive), median (interquartile range) baseline scores were 38 (29 to 47) for fatigue, 5.1 (4.4 to 5.9) for QoL, 35% (10 to 70) for work impairment, and 50% (20 to 70) for activity impairment. Mean improvement “on dupilumab” was −3.3 (95% CI, −4.7 to −1.9) for fatigue, 0.4 (0.3 to 0.5) for QoL, −9% (−15 to −2) for work impairment, and −6% (−10 to −3) for activity impairment. Improvements were greater in patients with larger asthma symptom control improvement. Minimal clinically important differences were achieved by 50% for the 6-item Asthma Control Questionnaire, 46% for QoL, and 30% or less for fatigue and work and activity impairment, with higher rates among those impaired at baseline. Conclusions: Fatigue, QoL, and work and activity impairment improved following dupilumab initiation, though most patients did not achieve clinically relevant improvements. Effects on fatigue and work and activity impairment appear less pronounced compared with asthma symptom control, possibly due to irreversible impairments in some patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)656-665.e9
JournalJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2026

Keywords

  • Activity impairment
  • Anti–IL-4/13
  • Biologics
  • Fatigue
  • Health-related quality of life
  • Registry
  • Severe asthma
  • Work productivity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of Dupilumab for Severe Asthma on Fatigue, Quality of Life, Work Productivity, and Activity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this