Illumina/Grail in light of the Draghi Report: Decoding a paradigm to catch killer acquisitions

Kalpana Tyagi*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The Court of Justice of the European Union's decision in Illumina/Grail limits the European Commission's power to accept non-notifiable transactions from the EU Member States. The decision also offers an insightful multi-pronged literal, historical, contextual and teleological interpretation of Article 22 of the EU Merger Control Regulation 139/2004. This article maps the Court’s decision in light of the Draghi recommendation to ‘revamping’ competition for more streamlined and effective enforcement. Following a thorough analysis of the decision, it decodes the dispersed legislative instruments, which can potentially capture innovation-driven acquisitions, that may otherwise escape scrutiny under the traditional turnover-based merger control framework. To offer a complete view, the discussion also refers to ex-post developments, including but not limited to the Illumina/Grail-related developments as well as the Commission's unconditional clearance of Nvidia/Run:ai, a prominent innovation-driven merger in the generative AI-sector.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-15
JournalMaastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 19 May 2025

Keywords

  • call-in powers
  • Digital Markets Act
  • Draghi Report
  • EU Merger Control Regulation
  • Illumina/Grail
  • innovation mergers
  • Nvidia/Run:ai
  • Towercast

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Illumina/Grail in light of the Draghi Report: Decoding a paradigm to catch killer acquisitions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this