Abstract
Poisson data frequently exhibit overdispersion; and, for univariate models, many options exist to circumvent this problem. Nonetheless, in complex scenarios, for example, in longitudinal studies, accounting for overdispersion is a more challenging task. Recently, Molenberghs et.al, presented a model that accounts for overdispersion by combining two sets of random effects. However, introducing a new set of random effects implies additional distributional assumptions for intrinsically unobservable variables, which has not been considered before. Using the combined model as a framework, we explored the impact of ignoring overdispersion in complex longitudinal settings via simulations. Furthermore, we evaluated the effect of misspecifying the random-effects distribution on both the combined model and the classical Poisson hierarchical model. Our results indicate that even though inferences may be affected by ignored overdispersion, the combined model is a promising tool in this scenario.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1475-1482 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Statistics in Medicine |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 14 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 30 Jun 2012 |
Keywords
- Poisson-normal model
- overdispersion
- hierachical
- combined model
- Type I error