Identifying Age, Cohort and Period Effects in Scientific Research Productivity: Discussion and Illustration Using Simulated and Actual Data on French Physicists

B.H. Hall*, J. Mairesse, L. Turner

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The identification of age, cohort (vintage), and period (year) effects in a panel of individuals or other units is an old problem in the social sciences, but one that has not been much studied in the context of measuring researcher productivity. In the context of a semi-parametric model of productivity, where these effects are assumed to enter in an additive manner, we present the conditions necessary to identify and test for the presence of the three effects. In particular, we show that failure to specify, precisely, the conditions under which such a model is identified can lead to misleading conclusions about the productivity–age relationship. We illustrate our methods using data on the publications 1986–1997 by 465 french condensed-matter physicists who were born between 1936 and 1960.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)159-177
Number of pages19
JournalEconomics of Innovation and New Technology
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2007

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Identifying Age, Cohort and Period Effects in Scientific Research Productivity: Discussion and Illustration Using Simulated and Actual Data on French Physicists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this