Hydrology and Hydraulics Expertise in Participatory Processes for Climate Change Adaptation in the Dutch Meuse Water

W.E. Bijker, A.J. Wesselink, H.J. de Vriend, H.J. Barneveld, M.S. Krol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Many scientists feel that scientific outcomes are not sufficiently taken into account in policy-making. The research reported in this paper shows what happens with scientific information during such a process. In 2001 the Dutch Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management commissioned their regional office in Limburg to assess how flood management objectives could be achieved in future in the Dutch Meuse valley, assuming climate change will increase peak discharges. To ensure political support, regional discussion rounds were to help assess the measures previously identified. This paper discusses the ways in which hydrological and hydraulic expertise was input, understood and used in this assessment process. Project participants as a group had no trouble contesting assumptions and outcomes. Nevertheless, water expertise was generally accepted as providing facts, once basic choices such as starting situation had been discussed and agreed. The technical constraints determined that politically unacceptable measures would have to be selected to achieve the legally binding flood management objective. As a result, no additional space will be set aside for future flood management beyond the already reserved floodplain. In this case, political arguments clearly prevail over policy objectives, with hydraulic expertise providing decisive arbitration between the two.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)583-595
JournalWater Science and Technology
Volume60
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2009

Cite this

Bijker, W.E. ; Wesselink, A.J. ; de Vriend, H.J. ; Barneveld, H.J. ; Krol, M.S. / Hydrology and Hydraulics Expertise in Participatory Processes for Climate Change Adaptation in the Dutch Meuse Water. In: Water Science and Technology. 2009 ; Vol. 60, No. 3. pp. 583-595.
@article{2784b031750f46bda931bd97dcd9b8be,
title = "Hydrology and Hydraulics Expertise in Participatory Processes for Climate Change Adaptation in the Dutch Meuse Water",
abstract = "Many scientists feel that scientific outcomes are not sufficiently taken into account in policy-making. The research reported in this paper shows what happens with scientific information during such a process. In 2001 the Dutch Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management commissioned their regional office in Limburg to assess how flood management objectives could be achieved in future in the Dutch Meuse valley, assuming climate change will increase peak discharges. To ensure political support, regional discussion rounds were to help assess the measures previously identified. This paper discusses the ways in which hydrological and hydraulic expertise was input, understood and used in this assessment process. Project participants as a group had no trouble contesting assumptions and outcomes. Nevertheless, water expertise was generally accepted as providing facts, once basic choices such as starting situation had been discussed and agreed. The technical constraints determined that politically unacceptable measures would have to be selected to achieve the legally binding flood management objective. As a result, no additional space will be set aside for future flood management beyond the already reserved floodplain. In this case, political arguments clearly prevail over policy objectives, with hydraulic expertise providing decisive arbitration between the two.",
author = "W.E. Bijker and A.J. Wesselink and {de Vriend}, H.J. and H.J. Barneveld and M.S. Krol",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2166/wst.2009.412",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "583--595",
journal = "Water Science and Technology",
issn = "0273-1223",
publisher = "IWA Publishing",
number = "3",

}

Hydrology and Hydraulics Expertise in Participatory Processes for Climate Change Adaptation in the Dutch Meuse Water. / Bijker, W.E.; Wesselink, A.J.; de Vriend, H.J.; Barneveld, H.J.; Krol, M.S.

In: Water Science and Technology, Vol. 60, No. 3, 01.01.2009, p. 583-595.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hydrology and Hydraulics Expertise in Participatory Processes for Climate Change Adaptation in the Dutch Meuse Water

AU - Bijker, W.E.

AU - Wesselink, A.J.

AU - de Vriend, H.J.

AU - Barneveld, H.J.

AU - Krol, M.S.

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Many scientists feel that scientific outcomes are not sufficiently taken into account in policy-making. The research reported in this paper shows what happens with scientific information during such a process. In 2001 the Dutch Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management commissioned their regional office in Limburg to assess how flood management objectives could be achieved in future in the Dutch Meuse valley, assuming climate change will increase peak discharges. To ensure political support, regional discussion rounds were to help assess the measures previously identified. This paper discusses the ways in which hydrological and hydraulic expertise was input, understood and used in this assessment process. Project participants as a group had no trouble contesting assumptions and outcomes. Nevertheless, water expertise was generally accepted as providing facts, once basic choices such as starting situation had been discussed and agreed. The technical constraints determined that politically unacceptable measures would have to be selected to achieve the legally binding flood management objective. As a result, no additional space will be set aside for future flood management beyond the already reserved floodplain. In this case, political arguments clearly prevail over policy objectives, with hydraulic expertise providing decisive arbitration between the two.

AB - Many scientists feel that scientific outcomes are not sufficiently taken into account in policy-making. The research reported in this paper shows what happens with scientific information during such a process. In 2001 the Dutch Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management commissioned their regional office in Limburg to assess how flood management objectives could be achieved in future in the Dutch Meuse valley, assuming climate change will increase peak discharges. To ensure political support, regional discussion rounds were to help assess the measures previously identified. This paper discusses the ways in which hydrological and hydraulic expertise was input, understood and used in this assessment process. Project participants as a group had no trouble contesting assumptions and outcomes. Nevertheless, water expertise was generally accepted as providing facts, once basic choices such as starting situation had been discussed and agreed. The technical constraints determined that politically unacceptable measures would have to be selected to achieve the legally binding flood management objective. As a result, no additional space will be set aside for future flood management beyond the already reserved floodplain. In this case, political arguments clearly prevail over policy objectives, with hydraulic expertise providing decisive arbitration between the two.

U2 - 10.2166/wst.2009.412

DO - 10.2166/wst.2009.412

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 583

EP - 595

JO - Water Science and Technology

JF - Water Science and Technology

SN - 0273-1223

IS - 3

ER -