TY - JOUR
T1 - Humanized Recommender Systems: State-of-the-art and Research Issues
AU - Tran, T.N.T.
AU - Felfernig, A.
AU - Tintarev, N.
N1 - Funding Information:
The reviewing of this article was managed by associate editor Berkovsky, Shlomo. The work presented in this article has been developed within the scope of the OpenReq project (Intelligent Recommender and Decision Technologies for Community-Driven Requirements Engineering) no. 732463, funded by the European Commission - H2020 ICT Program. Authors’ addresses: T. N. T. Tran and A. Felfernig, Institute of Software Technology, Graz University of Technology, Inffeldgasse 16b/II, Graz, Austria, 8010; emails: {ttrang, alexander.felfernig}@ist.tugraz.at; N. Tintarev, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Maastricht University, Paul-Henri Spaaklaan 1, Maastricht, The Netherlands, 6229 EN; email: [email protected]. Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]. © 2021 Association for Computing Machinery. 2160-6455/2021/06-ART9 $15.00 https://doi.org/10.1145/3446906
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Association for Computing Machinery.
PY - 2021/7/1
Y1 - 2021/7/1
N2 - Psychological factors such as personality, emotions, social connections, and decision biases can significantly affect the outcome of a decision process. These factors are also prevalent in the existing literature related to the inclusion of psychological aspects in recommender system development. Personality and emotions of users have strong connections with their interests and decision-making behavior. Hence, integrating these factors into recommender systems can help to better predict users' item preferences and increase the satisfaction with recommended items. In scenarios where decisions are made by groups (e.g., selecting a tourism destination to visit with friends), group composition and social connections among group members can affect the outcome of a group decision. Decision biases often occur in a recommendation process, since users usually apply heuristics when making a decision. These biases can result in low-quality decisions. In this article, we provide a rigorous review of existing research on the influence of the mentioned psychological factors on recommender systems. These factors are not only considered in single-user recommendation scenarios but, importantly, also in group recommendation ones, where groups of users are involved in a decision-making process. We include working examples to provide a deeper understanding of how to take into account these factors in recommendation processes. The provided examples go beyond single-user recommendation scenarios by also considering specific aspects of group recommendation settings.
AB - Psychological factors such as personality, emotions, social connections, and decision biases can significantly affect the outcome of a decision process. These factors are also prevalent in the existing literature related to the inclusion of psychological aspects in recommender system development. Personality and emotions of users have strong connections with their interests and decision-making behavior. Hence, integrating these factors into recommender systems can help to better predict users' item preferences and increase the satisfaction with recommended items. In scenarios where decisions are made by groups (e.g., selecting a tourism destination to visit with friends), group composition and social connections among group members can affect the outcome of a group decision. Decision biases often occur in a recommendation process, since users usually apply heuristics when making a decision. These biases can result in low-quality decisions. In this article, we provide a rigorous review of existing research on the influence of the mentioned psychological factors on recommender systems. These factors are not only considered in single-user recommendation scenarios but, importantly, also in group recommendation ones, where groups of users are involved in a decision-making process. We include working examples to provide a deeper understanding of how to take into account these factors in recommendation processes. The provided examples go beyond single-user recommendation scenarios by also considering specific aspects of group recommendation settings.
KW - Recommender systems
KW - group recommender systems
KW - human decision making
KW - decision biases
KW - psychological factors
KW - group dynamics
KW - GROUP DECISION-MAKING
KW - SOCIAL-INFLUENCE
KW - PERSONALITY
KW - EMOTION
KW - PREFERENCES
KW - CONFLICT
KW - NETWORKS
KW - COHESION
KW - BEHAVIOR
KW - CONTEXT
U2 - 10.1145/3446906
DO - 10.1145/3446906
M3 - Article
SN - 2160-6463
VL - 11
JO - ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems
JF - ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems
IS - 2
M1 - 9
ER -