How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: data extraction, risk of bias, and transferability (part 3/3)

B. F. M. Wijnen; G. A. P. G. Van Mastrigt; W. K. Redekop; H. J. M. Majoie; R. J. A. De Kinderen; S. M. A. A. Evers

doi:10.1080/14737167.2016.1246961

How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: data extraction, risk of bias, and transferability (part 3/3)

B. F. M. Wijnen^*, G. A. P. G. Van Mastrigt, W. K. Redekop, H. J. M. Majoie, R. J. A. De Kinderen, S. M. A. A. Evers

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

83 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

Introduction: This article is part of the series How to Prepare a Systematic Review (SR) of Economic Evaluations (EE) for Informing Evidence-based Healthcare Decisions in which a five-step-approach for conducting a SR of EE is proposed.Areas covered: This paper explains the data extraction process, the risk of bias assessment and the transferability of EEs by means of a narrative review and expert opinion. SRs play a critical role in determining the comparative cost-effectiveness of healthcare interventions. It is important to determine the risk of bias and the transferability of an EE.Expert commentary: Over the past decade, several criteria lists have been developed. This article aims to provide recommendations on these criteria lists based on the thoroughness of development, feasibility, overall quality, recommendations of leading organizations, and widespread use.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	723-732
Journal	Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Volume	16
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2016.1246961
Publication status	Published - Dec 2016

Keywords

Systematic reviews
economic evaluations
clinical practice guidelines
risk of bias
quality appraisal
data-extraction

Access to Document

10.1080/14737167.2016.1246961

Cite this

Wijnen, B. F. M., Van Mastrigt, G. A. P. G., Redekop, W. K., Majoie, H. J. M., De Kinderen, R. J. A., & Evers, S. M. A. A. (2016). How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: data extraction, risk of bias, and transferability (part 3/3). Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 16(6), 723-732. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2016.1246961

@article{64e8f4186fe74c26bf6168490bce8c3b,

title = "How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: data extraction, risk of bias, and transferability (part 3/3)",

abstract = "Introduction: This article is part of the series How to Prepare a Systematic Review (SR) of Economic Evaluations (EE) for Informing Evidence-based Healthcare Decisions in which a five-step-approach for conducting a SR of EE is proposed.Areas covered: This paper explains the data extraction process, the risk of bias assessment and the transferability of EEs by means of a narrative review and expert opinion. SRs play a critical role in determining the comparative cost-effectiveness of healthcare interventions. It is important to determine the risk of bias and the transferability of an EE.Expert commentary: Over the past decade, several criteria lists have been developed. This article aims to provide recommendations on these criteria lists based on the thoroughness of development, feasibility, overall quality, recommendations of leading organizations, and widespread use.",

keywords = "Systematic reviews, economic evaluations, clinical practice guidelines, risk of bias, quality appraisal, data-extraction",

author = "Wijnen, {B. F. M.} and {Van Mastrigt}, {G. A. P. G.} and Redekop, {W. K.} and Majoie, {H. J. M.} and {De Kinderen}, {R. J. A.} and Evers, {S. M. A. A.}",

year = "2016",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1080/14737167.2016.1246961",

language = "English",

volume = "16",

pages = "723--732",

journal = "Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research",

issn = "1473-7167",

publisher = "Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group",

number = "6",

}

Wijnen, BFM , Van Mastrigt, GAPG, Redekop, WK, Majoie, HJM, De Kinderen, RJA & Evers, SMAA 2016, 'How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: data extraction, risk of bias, and transferability (part 3/3)', Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 723-732. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2016.1246961

How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: data extraction, risk of bias, and transferability (part 3/3). / Wijnen, B. F. M.; Van Mastrigt, G. A. P. G.; Redekop, W. K. et al.

In: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, Vol. 16, No. 6, 12.2016, p. 723-732.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: data extraction, risk of bias, and transferability (part 3/3)

AU - Wijnen, B. F. M.

AU - Van Mastrigt, G. A. P. G.

AU - Redekop, W. K.

AU - Majoie, H. J. M.

AU - De Kinderen, R. J. A.

AU - Evers, S. M. A. A.

PY - 2016/12

Y1 - 2016/12

N2 - Introduction: This article is part of the series How to Prepare a Systematic Review (SR) of Economic Evaluations (EE) for Informing Evidence-based Healthcare Decisions in which a five-step-approach for conducting a SR of EE is proposed.Areas covered: This paper explains the data extraction process, the risk of bias assessment and the transferability of EEs by means of a narrative review and expert opinion. SRs play a critical role in determining the comparative cost-effectiveness of healthcare interventions. It is important to determine the risk of bias and the transferability of an EE.Expert commentary: Over the past decade, several criteria lists have been developed. This article aims to provide recommendations on these criteria lists based on the thoroughness of development, feasibility, overall quality, recommendations of leading organizations, and widespread use.

AB - Introduction: This article is part of the series How to Prepare a Systematic Review (SR) of Economic Evaluations (EE) for Informing Evidence-based Healthcare Decisions in which a five-step-approach for conducting a SR of EE is proposed.Areas covered: This paper explains the data extraction process, the risk of bias assessment and the transferability of EEs by means of a narrative review and expert opinion. SRs play a critical role in determining the comparative cost-effectiveness of healthcare interventions. It is important to determine the risk of bias and the transferability of an EE.Expert commentary: Over the past decade, several criteria lists have been developed. This article aims to provide recommendations on these criteria lists based on the thoroughness of development, feasibility, overall quality, recommendations of leading organizations, and widespread use.

KW - Systematic reviews

KW - economic evaluations

KW - clinical practice guidelines

KW - risk of bias

KW - quality appraisal

KW - data-extraction

U2 - 10.1080/14737167.2016.1246961

DO - 10.1080/14737167.2016.1246961

M3 - Article

C2 - 27762640

VL - 16

SP - 723

EP - 732

JO - Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research

JF - Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research

SN - 1473-7167

IS - 6

ER -

Wijnen BFM , Van Mastrigt GAPG, Redekop WK, Majoie HJM, De Kinderen RJA, Evers SMAA. How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: data extraction, risk of bias, and transferability (part 3/3). Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research. 2016 Dec;16(6):723-732. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2016.1246961