Abstract
This paper analyzes how to choose a delegation, a committee to represent a society such as in a peace conference. We propose normative conditions and seek Pareto optimal, consistent, neutral, and non-manipulable ways to choose a delegation. We show that a class of threshold rules is characterized by these criteria. The rules do not choose a fixed number of delegates, but instead require different sizes of delegations, depending on the heterogeneity in society. Therefore the resulting delegations are very inclusive, and with t delegates the ratio of individuals whose opinions are not included is always below . For instance, a delegation of size two should have at least 75% support from the society and therefore only less than 25% of the opinion pool can be neglected.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1339-1373 |
| Number of pages | 35 |
| Journal | Economic Theory |
| Volume | 72 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 27 Sept 2020 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2021 |
JEL classifications
- c70 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory: General
- d71 - "Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations"
Keywords
- Aggregation rules
- Committee selection
- Conflict management
- Kemeny distance
- Strategy-proofness
- PREFERENCE AGGREGATION
- STRATEGY-PROOFNESS
- LORENZ CURVES
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How to choose a fair delegation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver