How success is evaluated in collaborative invasive species management: A systematic review

Nisansala Abeysinghe*, Angela M. Guerrero, Jonathan R. Rhodes, Eve McDonald-Madden, Christopher J. O'Bryan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal(Systematic) Review article peer-review

Abstract

Invasive species are one of the most pressing global challenges for biodiversity and agriculture. They can cause species extinctions, ecosystem alterations, crop damage, and spread harmful diseases across broad regions. Overcoming this challenge requires collaborative management efforts that span multiple land tenures and jurisdictions. Despite evidence on the importance and approaches to collaboration, there is little understanding of how success is evaluated in the invasive species management literature. This is a major gap, considering evaluating success is crucial for enhancing the efficacy of future management projects. To overcome this knowledge gap, we systematically reviewed the published literature to identify the stages at which success is evaluated - that is, the Process stage (collaborative management actions and Processes), Outputs stage (results of management actions to protect environmental, economic, and social values) and Outcomes stage (effects of Outputs on environmental, economic, and social values) of collaborative invasive species management projects. We also assessed what indicators were used to identify success and whether these evaluations vary across different characteristics of collaborative invasive species management. Our literature search detected 1406 papers, of which 58 met our selection criteria. Out of these, the majority of papers evaluated success across two stages (n = 25, 43.1%), whereas only ten (17.2%) papers evaluated success across all stages. Outputs were the most commonly evaluated stage (n = 40, 68.9%). The most widely used indicators of success for these stages included increased collaboration of stakeholders (Process stage), the number of captured/eradicated/controlled invasive species (Outputs stage) and change in biodiversity values, such as the number of threatened species (Outcomes stage). Most indicators of success were environmentally focused. We highlight the need to align the indicators of success and evaluation stages with the fundamental objectives of the projects to increase the effectiveness of evaluations and thereby maximise the benefits of collaborative invasive species management.
Original languageEnglish
Article number119272
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Environmental Management
Volume348
Early online dateOct 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Dec 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Biological invasions
  • Collaboration process
  • Management outputs
  • Success evaluation
  • Success measures

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How success is evaluated in collaborative invasive species management: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this