How do medical students make sense of internal and external feedback to enhance their Dutch communication skills?

Hao Yu*, Zhien Li, S. Eleonore Kohler, Jeroen J. G. van Merrienboer, Maryam Asoodar

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BackgroundFeedback is crucial in medical education for developing communication skills and fostering comprehensive learning. Despite its importance, medical students often face challenges in effectively leveraging feedback. This study investigates how students perceive and make sense of internal and external feedback in a 2nd language (L2) medical Dutch course.MethodsSixteen third-year international medical students (mean age = 23) participated in a medical Dutch course that included six structured sessions. Each session encompassed a briefing, simulated patient consultations (SPCs), and a debriefing. The curriculum integrated internal feedback from self-reflections and external feedback from peers, teachers, and simulated patients. Data were gathered through a students' feedback perception survey and semi-structured interviews and analyzed via inductive thematic analysis.ResultsSurvey data indicated a trend where the preference, satisfaction, and trust in external feedback were higher than those for internal feedback. However, both types of feedback were regarded as equally effective in facilitating learning progress. Through thematic analysis, we identified five crucial themes that show how students perceive and make sense of various forms of feedback: proactive engagement with feedback, critically analyzing and utilizing the exchange in dialogues and discussions, self-reflection and progress tracking, value from diverse perspectives, and moment-specific and actionable feedback.ConclusionsThis study emphasizes the vital roles of internal and external feedback in enhancing medical Dutch communication skills among medical students. Internal feedback encourages self-reflection and growth, essential for complex medical communications, while external feedback provides clear, specific and supportive guidance and experience from teachers, simulated patients and peers. These feedback mechanisms together improve students' skills in medical Dutch communication, leading to better doctor-patient interactions. Future research should focus on adapting these feedback strategies across diverse educational settings to further support the development of medical L2 communication skills in global medical contexts.
Original languageEnglish
Article number256
Number of pages10
JournalBMC Medical Education
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Feb 2025

Keywords

  • Medical Dutch
  • Communication skills
  • Simulated patient consultations
  • Internal feedback
  • External feedback
  • Reflective practice
  • Self-regulation
  • Second Language learning
  • FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT
  • LEARNERS
  • FOCUS
  • MODEL

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How do medical students make sense of internal and external feedback to enhance their Dutch communication skills?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this