How can clinical practice guidelines be adapted to facilitate shared decision making? A qualitative key-informant study

Trudy van der Weijden*, Arwen H. Pieterse, Marije S. Koelewijn-van Loon, Loes Knaapen, France Legare, Antoine Boivin, Jako S. Burgers, Anne M. Stiggelbout, Marjan Faber, Glyn Elwyn

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

50 Citations (Web of Science)

Abstract

Background To explore how clinical practice guidelines can be adapted to facilitate shared decision making. Methods This was a qualitative key-informant study with group discussions and semi-structured interviews. First, 75 experts in guideline development or shared decision making participated in group discussions at two international conferences. Next, health professionals known as experts in depression or breast cancer, experts on clinical practice guidelines and/or shared decision making, and patient representatives were interviewed (N=20). Using illustrative treatment decisions on depression or breast cancer, we asked the interviewees to indicate as specifically as they could how guidelines could be used to facilitate shared decision making. Results Interviewees suggested some generic strategies, namely to include a separate chapter on the importance of shared decision making, to use language that encourages patient involvement, and to develop patient versions of guidelines. Recommendation-specific strategies, related to specific decision points in the guideline, were also suggested: These include structuring the presentation of healthcare options to increase professionals' option awareness; structuring the deliberation process between professionals and patients; and providing relevant patient support tools embedded at important decision points in the guideline. Conclusions This study resulted in an overview of strategies to adapt clinical practice guidelines to facilitate shared decision making. Some strategies seemed more contentious than others. Future research should assess the feasibility and impact of these strategies to make clinical practice guidelines more conducive to facilitate shared decision making.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)855-863
JournalBMJ Quality & Safety
Volume22
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2013

Keywords

  • Clinical practice guidelines
  • Shared decision making
  • Quality improvement

Cite this