Abstract
Abstract: The evaluation of legal scholarship and its outputs is a complex task with far-reaching consequences. Such evaluations can affect the academic careers of individuals, the reputation of research institutions, the overall quality of academic work, and the development of law as a discipline. This article examines how legal scholarship and its outputs are evaluated abroad. It maps evaluation practices from the perspective of relevant institutions in six selected countries (Italy, Belgium, Spain, Sweden, the Netherlands, and France). It then discusses in detail the internal debates on quality assessment at the Faculty of Law of Maastricht University. The aim of the article is not only to present experiences from abroad but also to stimulate discussion on how the outputs of legal scholarship should and could be evaluated in the Czech Republic.
| Translated title of the contribution | Evaluation of legal scholarship - experience from abroad |
|---|---|
| Original language | Czech |
| Pages (from-to) | 89-96 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Jurisprudence |
| Volume | XXXIV |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2025 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of legal scholarship - experience from abroad'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver