TY - JOUR
T1 - Healthy shopping dynamics
T2 - The healthiness of sequential grocery choices
AU - van Ittersum, Koert
AU - van der Heide, Martine T.
AU - Holtrop, Niels
AU - Bijmolt, Tammo H.A.
AU - van Doorn, Jenny
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors are thankful to Linda Grondsma, Rutmer Faber, and Sanne Schreurs for their help with the initial data preparation and analyses of the purchase data. Furthermore, the authors would like to thank the Marketing Science Institute for its generous assistance in funding this research (MSI Research Grant 4-1991).
data source: Primary experimental data from MTurk participants (Study 2) and secondary handheld scanner data from an anonymous retailer (Study 1)
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - Improving the healthiness of diets can be realized by replacing unhealthy with healthier product alternatives when shopping for groceries. For this strategy to be effective, shoppers need to consistently make healthier choices. However, shoppers may end up balancing the healthiness of their choices throughout the shopping trip, (partly) offsetting the benefits of a healthy product choice (e.g., low-fat milk) by an unhealthy subsequent choice (e.g., sugary cornflakes). Across two studies, one study with purchase data from a brick-and-mortar supermarket and one online experimental study, we empirically demonstrate that the relative healthiness of an initial product choice is indeed inversely related to the relative healthiness of the subsequent choice, regardless of the category of both products. That means: a relatively healthy choice is followed by a relatively unhealthier choice, and vice versa. Furthermore, the strength of this balancing effect differs depending on the nature of the product category; the dynamic effect is less pronounced when subsequently choosing within a vice (vs. virtue) product category. In the brick-and-mortar supermarket, the dynamics also become less pronounced as the shopping trip progresses. These findings contribute to literature on in-store decision-making and within-trip dynamics, and underscore the need for retailers to have a thorough understanding of these healthy shopping dynamics in order to effectively promote healthier baskets in support of the growing demand for healthy diets.
AB - Improving the healthiness of diets can be realized by replacing unhealthy with healthier product alternatives when shopping for groceries. For this strategy to be effective, shoppers need to consistently make healthier choices. However, shoppers may end up balancing the healthiness of their choices throughout the shopping trip, (partly) offsetting the benefits of a healthy product choice (e.g., low-fat milk) by an unhealthy subsequent choice (e.g., sugary cornflakes). Across two studies, one study with purchase data from a brick-and-mortar supermarket and one online experimental study, we empirically demonstrate that the relative healthiness of an initial product choice is indeed inversely related to the relative healthiness of the subsequent choice, regardless of the category of both products. That means: a relatively healthy choice is followed by a relatively unhealthier choice, and vice versa. Furthermore, the strength of this balancing effect differs depending on the nature of the product category; the dynamic effect is less pronounced when subsequently choosing within a vice (vs. virtue) product category. In the brick-and-mortar supermarket, the dynamics also become less pronounced as the shopping trip progresses. These findings contribute to literature on in-store decision-making and within-trip dynamics, and underscore the need for retailers to have a thorough understanding of these healthy shopping dynamics in order to effectively promote healthier baskets in support of the growing demand for healthy diets.
KW - Healthy food consumption
KW - In-store decision-making
KW - Sequential choices
KW - Vice and virtue categories
U2 - 10.1016/j.jretai.2023.09.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jretai.2023.09.002
M3 - Article
SN - 0022-4359
VL - 100
SP - 24
EP - 40
JO - Journal of Retailing
JF - Journal of Retailing
IS - 1
ER -