TY - JOUR
T1 - Healthcare professionals' perspectives on artificial intelligence in patient care
T2 - a systematic review of hindering and facilitating factors on different levels
AU - Henzler, Dennis
AU - Schmidt, Sebastian
AU - Kocar, Ayca
AU - Herdegen, Sophie
AU - Lindinger, Georg L.
AU - Maris, Menno T.
AU - Bak, Marieke A. R.
AU - Willems, Dick L.
AU - Tan, Hanno L.
AU - Lauerer, Michael
AU - Nagel, Eckhard
AU - Hindricks, Gerhard
AU - Dagres, Nikolaos
AU - Konopka, Magdalena J.
PY - 2025/5/1
Y1 - 2025/5/1
N2 - BackgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) applications present opportunities to enhance the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of various diseases. To successfully integrate and utilize AI in healthcare, it is crucial to understand the perspectives of healthcare professionals and to address challenges they associate with AI adoption at an early stage. Therefore, the aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of empirical studies that explore healthcare professionals' perspectives on AI in healthcare.MethodsThe review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework. The databases MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were searched in the timeline of 2017 to 2024 using terms related to 'healthcare professionals', 'artificial intelligence', and 'perspectives'. Eligible were peer-reviewed articles that employed quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods approaches. Extracted facilitating and hindering factors were analysed according to the dimensions of the socio-ecological model.ResultsOur search yielded 4,499 articles published up to February 2024. After title abstract screening, 150 full-texts were assessed for eligibility, and 72 studies were ultimately included in our synthesis. The extracted perspectives on AI were thematically analyzed using the socioecological model in order to identify various levels of influence and to categorize them into facilitating and hindering factors. In total, we identified 49 facilitating and 43 hindering factors across all levels of the socioecological model. ConclusionsThe findings from this review can serve as a foundation for developing guidelines for AI implementation adressing various stakeholders, from healthcare professionals to policymakers. Future research should focus on the empirical adoption of AI applications and, if possible, further examine the hindering factors associated with different types of AI.
AB - BackgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) applications present opportunities to enhance the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of various diseases. To successfully integrate and utilize AI in healthcare, it is crucial to understand the perspectives of healthcare professionals and to address challenges they associate with AI adoption at an early stage. Therefore, the aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of empirical studies that explore healthcare professionals' perspectives on AI in healthcare.MethodsThe review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework. The databases MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were searched in the timeline of 2017 to 2024 using terms related to 'healthcare professionals', 'artificial intelligence', and 'perspectives'. Eligible were peer-reviewed articles that employed quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods approaches. Extracted facilitating and hindering factors were analysed according to the dimensions of the socio-ecological model.ResultsOur search yielded 4,499 articles published up to February 2024. After title abstract screening, 150 full-texts were assessed for eligibility, and 72 studies were ultimately included in our synthesis. The extracted perspectives on AI were thematically analyzed using the socioecological model in order to identify various levels of influence and to categorize them into facilitating and hindering factors. In total, we identified 49 facilitating and 43 hindering factors across all levels of the socioecological model. ConclusionsThe findings from this review can serve as a foundation for developing guidelines for AI implementation adressing various stakeholders, from healthcare professionals to policymakers. Future research should focus on the empirical adoption of AI applications and, if possible, further examine the hindering factors associated with different types of AI.
KW - Artificial intelligence
KW - Barriers
KW - Facilitators
KW - Healthcare professionals
KW - Perspectives
KW - PERCEPTIONS
KW - TECHNOLOGY
KW - RESIDENTS
KW - FUTURE
KW - IMPACT
KW - AI
U2 - 10.1186/s12913-025-12664-2
DO - 10.1186/s12913-025-12664-2
M3 - (Systematic) Review article
SN - 1472-6963
VL - 25
JO - BMC Health Services Research
JF - BMC Health Services Research
IS - 1
M1 - 633
ER -